On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:40:14 +0100
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list
> Jay Cox
<16 of the 18 friends snipped>
> Chris Lahey
Only 18 friends?
Does the Gimp need more friends?
Or does the "Friends of Gimp" have some other meaning that
David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah! Good job. Now, it would be great if you managed to do the same
> for gimp-1.3.x. If all the necessary libs were ported too, we could even
> consider to include this in the main tree, WDYT?
Thanks, but John-Michael Mulesa deserves the credit. He did t
At 04:40 PM 12/24/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list at the
momenta
What is supposed to be the point of such a list? If you pulled names from a
changelog you are probably making a list of the more active developers of
the GIMP who are probably already on t
Hi all,
Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list at the
momenta The e-mail addresses I havce are from old changelogs and
mailing list archives (for obvious reasons I haven't included
them in the mail). If there are names I've forgotten, or e-mail addresses
which have changed in the las
Hi,
David Odin wrote:
> Yeah! Good job. Now, it would be great if you managed to do the same
> for gimp-1.3.x. If all the necessary libs were ported too, we could even
> consider to include this in the main tree, WDYT?
I think this is a great idea - you'd need to talk to Owen more
than likely,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:52:41PM -0800, Robin Rowe wrote:
> GIMP on Mac OS X without X11:
>
> http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/docs/gimp.html
>
Yeah! Good job. Now, it would be great if you managed to do the same
for gimp-1.3.x. If all the necessary libs were ported too, we could even
consider
Hi Robin,
Selon Robin Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> GIMP on Mac OS X without X11:
>
> http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/docs/gimp.html
Congratulations!
Anyone know if there is there a gdk aqua back-end in gtk+ 2.2.x? If not, is one
planned?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
_
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Putting the tarballs somewhere close to the GIMP tarball on the FTP
> server is of course reasonable. But unless I completely misunderstood
> you earlier, you proposed to include gegl as a virtual CVS module and
> to include it in the GIMP tarball. That's what we've been
