On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:06:50PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote:
> Le lun 05/01/2004 ?? 00:49, Roman Joost a ??crit :
>
> > 1. The problem, that the whole content is mixed up after the generation
> > is now fixed. The problem was, that only the dtd in gimp.xml was wrong.
> > It seems, that th
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:10:46PM +0100, raymond ostertag wrote:
> Le lun 05/01/2004 ?? 00:49, Roman Joost a ??crit :
> > a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a
> > generic font (like Bitstream Sans).
> >
> Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandra
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit :
> a) Screenshots should be made with the standard GNOME theme and a
> generic font (like Bitstream Sans).
>
Standard GNOME theme is ? I don't remember but on my Mandrake the
standard is Galaxy ??
> b) If we make some compositing images, we s
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit :
> 1. The problem, that the whole content is mixed up after the generation
> is now fixed. The problem was, that only the dtd in gimp.xml was wrong.
> It seems, that this was my fault and i'm sorry for that. I had a bit of
> time to add some ge
Le lun 05/01/2004 à 00:49, Roman Joost a écrit :
> 2. I customised the purposed StructureOfTheDocumentation[1] a bit. It
> should now be implementable by the doc writers. The main thing is,
> that the depth is on section 3 at maximum (see the table on the "top"
> of the proposal). I wouldn'
