[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
For example, in C, the compiler is legally allowed to transform:
r = (1 - a) * b;
into:
r = a - a * b;
Which might not be the same value. If that is a problem, you either have
to use more sequence points (i.e. multiple statements), or you
Hi,
The most recent installment from the GIMP production line, version
2.0pre2, is available now for perusal, downloading, evaluation, testing
and use from
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.0/testing/
or from one of the mirrors listed at http://gimp.org/download.html
Since the last release,
GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-17 at 1724.31 +0100):
a) It has a table of presets that is constructed in an ad hoc manner
without any explantation what the advantages to the user are.
Did your copy of the first mail I posted lacked:
Comments about the
[restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
[technical discussion :)]
I think I already explained why I prefer the set of ratios based on
the idea of homogenous zooming. So the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
[restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
[technical discussion :)]
I think I already explained why I prefer
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it
just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes.
True. (These break strict aliasing rules warnings however are harmless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
[technical discussion :)]
I think I already explained why I prefer the set of ratios based on
the idea of homogenous zooming. So the rest of this Mail focuses
on the technical issues of your patch.
The last patch I sent does homogenous
