Hi,
Ernst Lippe wrote:
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview/gimppreview.html
The major points in the discussion were that some people did not like
the way that the preliminary version of the preview tried to prevent
recursive updates and that the names did
Hi,
Ernst Lippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview/gimppreview.html
The major points in the discussion were that some people did not like
the way that the preliminary version of the preview tried to prevent
recursive updates and that the names did not start
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:18:58 +0100
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ernst Lippe wrote:
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview/gimppreview.html
The major points in the discussion were that some people did not like
the way that the
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:51:40 +0100
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ernst Lippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview/gimppreview.html
The major points in the discussion were that some people did not like
the way that the preliminary version of
Hi,
Ernst Lippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the preview itself does not generate any temporary drawables.
However there is a utility function for the plug-in to generate
such temporary drawables, when it finds that more convenient,
but in that case it is the responsibility of the plug-in
why?
attachment: part2.pif
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:14:30PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
it is going to be a tough act to follow robin rowe and cinepaint.
I know you are funny sometimes but we all know Robin reads this list and
such comments dont
it is going to be a tough act to follow robin rowe and cinepaint.
gimp-1.0 rox!
Should I feel flattered that GIMP can't stop talking about me and CinePaint,
even when it is to spread the misconception that CinePaint is GIMP 1.0?
GIMP people have demonstrated a persistent interest in
Hi Robin,
Robin Rowe wrote:
Should I feel flattered that GIMP can't stop talking about me and CinePaint,
even when it is to spread the misconception that CinePaint is GIMP 1.0?
Please don't jump to any conclusions here which might deepen any
ill-feeling that has developer between the programs.
On 18 Feb 2004, at 23:04, David Neary wrote:
Robin Rowe wrote:
The software we seek to surpass is Photoshop.
As I have said, that is also our target. With all due respect, I
believe we are moving closer to that target, faster, than
Cinepaint.
Since GIMP and CinePaint aim at completely
Hi,
David Ashley-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a quick question regarding GIMP-1.2.5: I've been improving tips
of the day, and would like to change the image associated with
them. After a bit of fruitless looking around, I assume it is
compiled into the GIMP executable. I couldn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
