Hi all,
It's become clear to me that the release manager doesn't have the power to do
much in the project. Since last Summer I've avoided using the title for the
simple reason that other people seem to resent the idea of titles, and I had
hoped that actions would speak for themselves.
Since
On 8 Mar 2004, at 15:29, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 13:54, Dave Neary wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
I think we should somehow get this setup at
http://manual.gimp.org/. When GIMP-2.0 is out, the GIMP User
Manual written by Karin and Olof will be pretty much
Branko Collin wrote:
I disagree. The appearance of GIMP 2 does not all of a sudden make
GIMP 1.2 obsolete. There is no technological reason why both manuals
cannot be hosted on the same site.
How abut having the manual of the latest stable version as the default (gimp 2),
and having a link to
Dave Neary wrote:
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Avoid self-dealing.
What's this?
Self-dealing is whenever the people who control the organization command the
organization to do business with themselves in their personal capacity.
Self-dealing tears the veil and makes the director or officer who
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branko Collin wrote:
I disagree. The appearance of GIMP 2 does not all of a sudden make
GIMP 1.2 obsolete. There is no technological reason why both manuals
cannot be hosted on the same site.
How abut having the manual of the latest stable
On Mar 8, 2004, at 8:25 AM, Kelly Martin wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Avoid self-dealing.
What's this?
Self-dealing is whenever the people who control the organization
command the organization to do business with themselves in their
personal capacity. Self-dealing tears the
Hi all,
the first snapshot of the newly written GIMP 2.0 User Manual is available
for download from:
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/help/testing/gimp-help-2-0.1.tar.gz
and includes help written in English, French, Swedish and German.
This developer snapshot is basically for soliciting new
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
If you are a board member you must:
Attend board meetings.
Is this required to be in person, or is conference call/irc/email/etc
sufficient? Furthermore, is it possible for board members to be
reimbursed for expenses? I can see this being a major obstacle for non-us
Daniel Rogers wrote:
1. I heard that some people have been asked to be on the board, why
weren't the developers consulted? I'm a developer, why wasn't I asked?
Who are these board members?
Keep in mind that developers will not necessarily make good board members. The
sort of decisions that a
Sven Neumann wrote:
If sueing copyright violators is the main goal, I'd rather let the
Free Software Foundation do this job. It is probably in a lot better
position when it should ever come to a law-suit.
The FSF can't sue someone unless it owns at least some part of the code in
question. The
Hi all,
The 2.0 release is getting closer, and there are still some thing missing from
the press pack we want to send out.
- Could native english speakers who have a few minutes please look at the
What's new in GIMP 2.0 page (http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/WhatsNew) and correct
any grammar
Hi again,
Dave Neary wrote:
- If anyone would like to donate an article on The GIMP 2.0, it is most
welcome (this might also be a source of revenue for funding if magazines
re-print it).
Speaking of magazines, that reminds me of one thing we have not done.
I have started a new page in
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 13:54, Dave Neary wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
I think we should somehow get this setup at http://manual.gimp.org/.
When GIMP-2.0 is out, the GIMP User Manual written by Karin and Olof
will be pretty much outdated and should IMHO be replaced by the help
written
Hello again,
It has been awhile since I have done a GIMP Foundation update. There
is quite a bit that must be decided on at this point. Also, people need
to decide how invovled they would like to be.
Summary:
My Goals,
Benefits of incorporation
responsibilites of those invovled
things to be
Here is few notes to address a few more concerns I have encountered,
I'll pose them retorically.
1. I heard that some people have been asked to be on the board, why
weren't the developers consulted? I'm a developer, why wasn't I asked?
Who are these board members?
In California every corporation
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Avoid self-dealing.
What's this?
Be honest.
Is this true of every board? Even Halliburton?
1. Will TGF have members? I am talking about members with voting
privledges, like I described above. (my vote is yes, btw)
Yes.
2. Should the membership be paid? (my vote is
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Daniel Rogers wrote:
Hello again,
It has been awhile since I have done a GIMP Foundation update. There
is quite a bit that must be decided on at this point. Also, people need
to decide how invovled they would like to be.
My goals for The GIMP really boil down to
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my mind one of the major reasons to have a Gimp Foundation is to put
all of our IP ducks in a row. As I've said before I don't think that
having contributors sign over copyright to TGF would be the best plan.
Instead, I would like to see
On 8 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my mind one of the major reasons to have a Gimp Foundation is to put
all of our IP ducks in a row. As I've said before I don't think that
having contributors sign over copyright to TGF would be the
19 matches
Mail list logo
