Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2004 18:39, Alan Horkan wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/23/forgent_jpeg_suit/
Has the issue of Jpeg Patents been brought up yet?
(a quick but not thorough search suggests not)
hmmm...What about waiting until october, and THEM start the Gimp
Hi again,
I have almost completed all the paperwork to get The GIMP Foundation up
and running. The last slightly compliciated bit left is to get the
bylaws finished.
I have a draft version of the bylaws that need a few gaps filled in.
I've put it here: http://www.phasevelocity.org/bylaws.doc The
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:16:46PM +, Pedro Gimeno Fortea wrote:
>
> - How many people don't agree about it being moderated?
>
this list is already moderated. you have the option to delete.
moderation starts at home.
> - Is there someone who volunteers to moderate the list? I'd offer
> m
On Friday 23 April 2004 18:39, Alan Horkan wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/23/forgent_jpeg_suit/
>
> Has the issue of Jpeg Patents been brought up yet?
> (a quick but not thorough search suggests not)
hmmm...What about waiting until october, and THEM start the Gimp Foundation?
You ca
On 23 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for those of you that are into statistiscs, have a look at this:
>
> http://libresoft.dat.escet.urjc.es/cvsanal/gnome-cvs/index.php?menu=Modules&module=gimp
Obviously, the top 21 on that page should get special privileges. ;)
Rockwalrus
On 23 Apr 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Photoshop handles large images better than GIMP. That's a known
> > > fact and it's not trivial to improve.
> >
> > How, exactly?
>
> AFAIK they don't load the full image into memory. If you open a large
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/23/forgent_jpeg_suit/
Has the issue of Jpeg Patents been brought up yet?
(a quick but not thorough search suggests not)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinf
Geert Jordaens wrote:
> I've modified the unsharp plugin and added a preview
> functionality to it. How do I share it, do I sent it to
> someone for review?
Branko Collin wrote:
> You should probably check first to see if a bug report
> for this has already been opened, and if people have
>
I've seen a bunch of messages with the title "Gimp 2.0" in the list
which were absolutely, definitively off-topic.
As a reminder, this list is intended for discussion about gimp
development-related issues. Many of the discussions are kept on IRC but
since not everyone is awake at all times a
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:03:49 -0300, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 23 April 2004 08:10, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the best way
> > > (although cumbersome) to figure ou
Hi,
First, I apologize in advance for my poor english, I'm french and not so
gifted for language.
Second, I have to present myself and why I'm writing to this list although I'm
not (and will not be) a GIMP programmer.
I'm part of a "free software user group" (free in the mean of french word
"l
On 23 Apr 2004, at 20:25, geert jordaens wrote:
> this is the first time I'm posting on this list. It realy is the gimp
> developer list?
Yes it is. Welcome!
> I've modified the unsharp plugin and added a preview
> functionality to it. How do I share it, do I sent it to someone for
> review?
T
hello,
this is the first time I'm posting on this list. It realy is the gimp
developer list?
I've modified the unsharp plugin and added a preview functionality to it.
How do I share it, do I sent it to someone for review?
kind regards
Geert Jordaens
_
Dear Marc,
> Please consider that millions of people have heard about this case on TV,
> but so far you are the only person who thinks of this case when looking
> at baby pictures (there is no connection to babies in the dutroux case at
> all...), at least the only person on this list, while many
Sven wrote:
> But it looks as if I introduced a bug when cleaning up the code and
> porting to GTK+-2.4.
I am classifying this one as NEEDINFO. What is the bug, please?
Could you submit it to Bugzilla so that there is a place to put a
fix should somebody happen to come up with one?
Best,
-- B
Hi,
for those of you that are into statistiscs, have a look at this:
http://libresoft.dat.escet.urjc.es/cvsanal/gnome-cvs/index.php?menu=Modules&module=gimp
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/l
On Friday 23 April 2004 08:10, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the best way
> > (although cumbersome) to figure out who is working on what. Maybe we
> > could make this easier by processing the C
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a script that I use to auto-generate a change log from a CVS
> repository that's used to generate the Gimp-Print change log. It
> coalesces multiple commits close in time that have the same log
> message and handles branches correctly (i.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:40:14AM +, Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You have not yet explained what exactly makes you think of Dutroux
> > when looking at the Photo and what exactly you think has been gained by
> > removing that image in that context. The Dutroux connection is
>
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 23 Apr 2004 13:10:00 +0200
Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the
> best way (although cumbersome) to figure out who is working on
> what. Maybe we could make this e
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Photoshop handles large images better than GIMP. That's a known
> > fact and it's not trivial to improve.
>
> How, exactly? I've heard this too, but I have no clear idea how
> they do so - do they have a similar caching system, and just make
> bett
Hi,
Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the best way
> (although cumbersome) to figure out who is working on what. Maybe we
> could make this easier by processing the ChangeLog automatically,
> analyzing who is working on what an
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I figured that the plug-in is not working correctly at the
> > moment. Not sure what exactly is going wrong but there's some
> > debugging needed here.
>
> I'm not sure what the problem you are having is, but I can say that
> last time I lo
Let's hear more about actual GIMP development on this list, eh? :)
It looks like the response to 2.0 has been positive albeit muted.
Congratulations to all, and luck with 2.2...
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
> This is news to me! where did Jesus say that?
He might be refering to Luke 18, 15-17.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
> I can think of a lot of reasons for Dave to a) remove the image and b)
> keep the image removed. This discussion being the first one (even
> without considering the positions exchanged [1]). I certainly won't ask
> him to put it up again because this is of no vital interest to me.
I know that i
Hi,
Simon Budig wrote:
Markus Triska ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Maybe Dave can explain to you why he did so, and you can then try
convincing him that he put the picture back, if this is what you want,
but please keep me out of that.
"Uh, this is getting too hot for me, let Dave pick the potatoes f
27 matches
Mail list logo
