Re: [Gimp-developer] more GIMP foundation stuff

2004-04-24 Thread pcg
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:00:17PM -0700, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've put it here: http://www.phasevelocity.org/bylaws.doc These bylaws Woaw, the bylaws for a free software organisation, written in a proprietary microsoft format! *g* -- -==-

Re: [Gimp-developer] The issue of JPEG Patents?

2004-04-24 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:47:49 -0700 > From: Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Joao S. O. Bueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] The issue of JPEG Patents? > > Joao S. O.

[Gimp-developer] conflict between 2.0 and 2.1

2004-04-24 Thread William Skaggs
Hi, I'd like to bring up what appears to be a conflict between 2.0 and 2.1 that will become relevant as soon as a tarball of 2.1 is released. Building 2.1 causes the version info in pkgconfig/gimp-2.0.pc to be set to 2.1. This means that any plug-in built thereafter will be installed in 2.1, an

Re: [Gimp-developer] The issue of JPEG Patents?

2004-04-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was thinking that Jpeg support might have to be preemptively removed > like Gif support was removed. (Although the Gif patents have expired in > America and will expire in Europe in June) When was GIF support removed and why didn't I notice? Sve

Re: [Gimp-developer] [META] Subject tags / List Moderation

2004-04-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Pedro Gimeno Fortea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, perhaps there is consensus on that the lists should be > moderated. If so, > > - How many people don't agree about it being moderated? Me. But I agree that we should try to keep discussions on-topic. Sven __

Re: [Gimp-developer] conflict between 2.0 and 2.1

2004-04-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to bring up what appears to be a conflict between 2.0 and > 2.1 that will become relevant as soon as a tarball of 2.1 is released. > Building 2.1 causes the version info in pkgconfig/gimp-2.0.pc to > be set to 2.1. This means that any

[Gimp-developer] Perl module, Gimp-2.0pre3.tar.gz available

2004-04-24 Thread Seth Burgess
The latest gimp-perl module pre-release is available! This fixes problems with the 'make test', as well as running scripts from the commandline (without a Perl-Server running). It also adds licensing info to each plug-in in the examples/ directory, since these are licensed individually. If you

Re: [Gimp-developer] The issue of JPEG Patents?

2004-04-24 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Saturday 24 April 2004 19:58, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was thinking that Jpeg support might have to be preemptively > > removed like Gif support was removed. (Although the Gif patents > > have expired in America and will expire in Europe in Jun