On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Daniel Rogers wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 22:47:49 -0700
From: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] The issue of JPEG Patents?
Joao S. O. Bueno
Hi,
I'd like to bring up what appears to be a conflict between 2.0 and
2.1 that will become relevant as soon as a tarball of 2.1 is released.
Building 2.1 causes the version info in pkgconfig/gimp-2.0.pc to
be set to 2.1. This means that any plug-in built thereafter will be
installed in 2.1,
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was thinking that Jpeg support might have to be preemptively removed
like Gif support was removed. (Although the Gif patents have expired in
America and will expire in Europe in June)
When was GIF support removed and why didn't I notice?
Sven
Hi,
Pedro Gimeno Fortea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, perhaps there is consensus on that the lists should be
moderated. If so,
- How many people don't agree about it being moderated?
Me.
But I agree that we should try to keep discussions on-topic.
Sven
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to bring up what appears to be a conflict between 2.0 and
2.1 that will become relevant as soon as a tarball of 2.1 is released.
Building 2.1 causes the version info in pkgconfig/gimp-2.0.pc to
be set to 2.1. This means that any
