On Thu, 20 May 2004, William Skaggs wrote:
> The motivation for doing this is that it seems to me that the existing
> edge detection plug-ins distributed with Gimp are rather weak in terms
> of output quality
Yeah, I've never been very happy with them.
> (their advantage is that, because they
Jo,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The motivation for doing this is that it seems to me that the
> existing edge detection plug-ins distributed with Gimp are rather
> weak in terms of output quality (their advantage is that, because
> they are all just 3x3 convolutions with diff
On 21 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Also I remember that the plan was to move all edge algorithms into
> edge.c in order to obsolete the other plug-ins in the distribution.
> That tasks has probably not been finished before 2.0. Might be a good
> time to do that now.
Come to think of it, it mig
Sven Neumann wrote:
> IIRC Dave did a change to the edge plug-in somewhen in the 1.3.x
> development cycle that incorporated code from the thinline
> plug-in. Doesn't that mean that it can produce similar results?
>
> Also I remember that the plan was to move all edge algorithms into
> edge.c in or
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also I remember that the plan was to move all edge algorithms into
> > edge.c in order to obsolete the other plug-ins in the distribution.
> > That tasks has probably not been finished before 2.0. Might be a good
> > time to do that now.
>
Hi,
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other edge-detection plug-ins in the 2.0.1 distro are Sobel and
> Laplace. The Sobel plug-in uses the same algorithm as the Sobel in
> edge.c, but allows a few extra options. The Laplace plug-in does
> nothing that is not included in the ed
Hi,
there are a couple of patches pending in Bugzilla that add previews to
some of our plug-ins. In particular these are:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140974
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142587
If you take a look at th
Hi!
Thanks for your answer!
> I find the alpha channel modification option useful in particular.
> However, as it is now it is merely a prototype. It definitely needs
> docs and lots of examples, preferably build in.
I am currently trying to write a good documentation, but it isn't that
easy... As
Hello,
This is just a random thought off the top of my head, but maybe it will
inspire someone...
It would probably be very cool if the "preview" functionality could be
implemented so that it could also act as a filter.
Such that, for instance, someone could grab a "looking glass" and
"attach
