Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
IMO it is too much of a compromise to even consider a name change.
Discussions like these server only one purpose - artificial creation of a
previously non-existant problem to support the position of the one who
started the
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:00:24 -0500
From: Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
Hi,
I've updated the API docs on http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/ in
preparation of the 2.2.0 release. I will be doing another update when
the release is finally out. If someone wants to look over the docs and
fix/improve them, that would be very much appreciated. The focus
should be on the
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, David [iso-8859-15] Gómez wrote:
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:19:26 +0100
From: David [iso-8859-15] Gómez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any
word on this yet?
It was decided that it was very important to get some input from artists
namely Jimmac
hi,
i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any
word on this yet?
i ask because someone has asked to borrow the script i used to make the
splash with -- i would like to use it one last time before sharing it --
on this panels decision.
is there a decision or an eta
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:59:08 -0800, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
lets schedule the changing of the name TheGIMP to Boondoggle right after
it is announced that you can change the name of photoshop to something
less hyped and media driven also.
Oh, I'm sure with a hex editor and
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:11:39PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
I do not know if you are a native English speaker but the term gimp is has
a very similar meaning to cripple. If you look at the bug report I
point to some comments where people other than me say they have
encountered
Hi Alan,
didn't you say you would stop arguing on this stupid subject?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:06:21 -0800
From: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
GIMPDev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +, Alan
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
It was decided that it was very important to get some input from artists
namely Jimmac Tigert and drc.
or maybe you await jimmacs approval since all of the splash images that
used his template now have his copyright on it?
there
Hi Carol,
Carol Spears wrote:
make a decision. was their any discussion here of the panel needing
the approval of these artists? the panel was put together to make a
recommendation to the developers. you need additional handholding? was
anyone interested in being on this panel who can
The suggestion of starting the integration process of GEGL into gimp
with the paint tools came up on irc today.
I have put some thought into the order such a conversion might happen in,
blend
pencil
paintbrush
eraser
dodge
blur
clone
smudge
airbrush
ink
The order lists what
Hello GIMP developers/users,
I have had some time to think now and it seems that maybe I should not
be incharge of the website. The reasons for this is as follows:
* My work takes a lot of my time, sometimes I am not home until 22:00
swedish time. This makes it hard to actually sit and do
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:52:03PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi Carol,
Carol Spears wrote:
make a decision. was their any discussion here of the panel needing
the approval of these artists? the panel was put together to make a
recommendation to the developers. you need additional
Hi Niklas,
Niklas Mattisson wrote:
I have had some time to think now and it seems that maybe I should not
be incharge of the website.
snip
Thanks for offering what little time you had, at a time where it
wasn't a job a lot of people wanted to have.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:26:37 +0100
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
Hi Alan,
didn't you say you would stop
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to ask why
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Selecting a splash is a daunting task. However, the weight may seem
less assuming the following tidbits are made readily accessible (say
via a Tip of the day)
- How one can replace the default splash with a personal one.
It's in
Hi Carol.
[nothing of much interest on this mail for people who are ok with the
panel]
On Monday 13 December 2004 22:25, Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:52:03PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi Carol,
Carol Spears wrote:
make a decision. was their any discussion here of
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Selecting a splash is a daunting task. However, the weight may seem
less assuming the following tidbits are made readily accessible (say
via a Tip of the day)
- How one can replace the default splash with a personal one.
It's in the gimp
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I probably was not clear enough. I think in the man page might not
be enough here. How about some mention of this in the first time
setup?
in the man-page should actually be good enough. After all it also
means on the web-site.
Sven
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 12:49:35AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Hi Carol.
[nothing of much interest on this mail for people who are ok with the
panel]
i am happy with the panel. please accept everything i said to mean you
and your opinion means more than anyone you need to
] ...I think in the man page might not
] be enough here. How about some mention of this in the first time
] setup?
]in the man-page should actually be good enough. After all it also
]means on the web-site.
Then man-page should be conspicuously displayed
on the main menu of the web site so it
24 matches
Mail list logo
