Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread William Skaggs
Robert Krawitz wrote: > 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in > pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into > standard alignment. I thought it was better to ask rather than > do it automatically, because there are probably a substantial >

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Selon Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There is now a file called "exif-handling.txt" in devel-docs > that summarizes my understanding, based on the exif > specifications, of how an image editor is supposed to handle the > exif data in a file. Of course we need

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:27:16PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > > Before people get high-horsey about this, consider that 90% of digital cameras > have embedded DOS as their OS, and are thus unable to generate files which are > not 8.3. > what are the 10% of the digital cameras that do not have emb

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, William Skaggs wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800 > From: William Skaggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Cc: @mail.primate.ucdavis.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary > > > Robert Krawitz wrote: > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Daniel Egger
On 05.01.2005, at 18:27, Dave Neary wrote: Before people get high-horsey about this, consider that 90% of digital cameras have embedded DOS as their OS, and are thus unable to generate files which are not 8.3. I don't think it is pretty safe to assume that FAT support means that anything close to

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:15:06PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote: > On 05.01.2005, at 18:27, Dave Neary wrote: > > >Before people get high-horsey about this, consider that 90% of digital > >cameras > >have embedded DOS as their OS, and are thus unable to generate files > >which are > >not 8.3. > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Daniel Egger
On 05.01.2005, at 22:37, Carol Spears wrote: canon rebel uses DOS. Possibly only as a bootloader or datashifter. According to http://www.alexbernstein.com/wiki/CanonDigitalRebelHacking the camera has three different processors and it is more than unlikely that the 80186 compatible processor is used

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:08:33 +0100 > canon rebel uses DOS. Possibly only as a bootloader or datashifter. According to http://www.alexbernstein.com/wiki/CanonDigitalRebelHacking the camera has three different processors and it is more

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:16 +0100 From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Selon Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There is now a file called "exif-handling.txt" in devel-docs > that summarizes my understanding, based on the exif > specifications, of how a

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800 From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Krawitz wrote: > 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in > pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into > standard alignment. I thought it wa