Hi,
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't that at least enough reason to take a closer look at the
> issue?
Are you as well starting with this accusation now? We are taking a
close look at this. We have already spent a lot of time on this,
probably way more than we should. I have
Hi,
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I usually work from "unprocessed" into "processed" directories, so does
> my sister-in-law (who taught herself, so my input isn't a
> consideration). My wife doesn't, but would if she felt comfortable
> enough about the rest of the computer (she ju
Hi,
Ingo Ruhnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> couldn't even figure out how to move a directory up with type-ahead,
> '..' doesn't work.
Alt-Up brings you up one level in the folder hierarchy.
> My experience shows that I need a more, need to grab the mouse and
> whatever. The new dialog is real
> Von: Bill Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Don't try to access my A: drive every time a dialog appears.
> If I really cared about the A: drive (I don't), I'll probably click
> on the icon for it! I heard others complain here that the file
> dialogs take FOREVER, since they try to
On Thursday 23 June 2005 16:40, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I usually work from "unprocessed" into "processed" directories, so
> > does my sister-in-law (who taught herself, so my input isn't a
> > consideration). My wife doesn't, but would if she felt comforta
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:24:24AM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > developers removed it. Why is something removed that is apparently
> > useful to a lot of people and is no problem for someone who does not
> > want to use it?
>
> Because it isn't needed. You can still enter th
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:35:51 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't that at least enough reason to take a closer look at the
> issue?
Are you as well starting with this accusation now? We are taking a
close look a
Hi folks,
I'm trying to get pygimp to work on gimp-2.3.1 for windows/autotools.
For some reason, the pygimp plugin seems not to be initialized.
Could someone sketch the mechanism by which pygimp is supposed to be loaded?
It looks like the pygimp.interp file is actually read and used: it
compla
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:43:07 -0400
From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been contributing suggestions both here and on the
bugzilla.gnome.org bug (whose number I forget). Yes, it's true that
my suggestion boils down to "bring back the text entry box!" and not a
who
> Von: "lode leroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm trying to get pygimp to work on gimp-2.3.1 for windows/autotools.
> For some reason, the pygimp plugin seems not to be initialized.
That's the same problem I have...
> Could someone sketch the mechanism by which pygimp is supposed to be
> loaded?
I
Could someone sketch the mechanism by which pygimp is supposed to be
loaded?
It is a python module (actually two of them), but even if you make sure
that
python should find them (either by a .pth file in python's
Lib/site-packages
directory or by copying it there, it doesn't work.
I meant t
ok, I found the missing link !
from http://hans.breuer.org/ports/readme.win32
set PATHEXT=%PATHEXT%;.py
ok. so now the .py plugins are getting loaded, but I get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\msys\1.0\target\lib\gimp\2.0\plug-ins\shadow_bevel.py", line 20,
in ?
from gimpfu im
On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:15, Leon Brooks wrote:
> I look forward to someone else finding a third (or forth) common
> workflow and a way to incorporate them all into a GTK file dialog.
> (-:
Should add in the existing dialogue's defence (if it needs one) that I
was delighted today to discover t
On Thursday 23 June 2005 21:41, lode leroy wrote:
> ImportError: No module named gimp
Guessing here - not being an MS-Windows user - that there is another
EnVar called something like LIBPATH or DLLPATH (or perhaps something
Python-specific) which you need to add the gimp module's path to.
Cheer
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> couldn't even figure out how to move a directory up with type-ahead,
>> '..' doesn't work.
>
> Alt-Up brings you up one level in the folder hierarchy.
This brings me only up one level in the presented folder hierachy, not
one level up in the directory h
> Von: "lode leroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I meant the following:
> Gimp must somehow load the module pygimp, which loads libpython,
> which loads the python scripts.
pygimp is a python module. GIMP exectues the python plug-ins, which are run
by python (remember the .interp file?).
You can even c
> Von: Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Guessing here - not being an MS-Windows user - that there is another
> EnVar called something like LIBPATH or DLLPATH (or perhaps something
> Python-specific) which you need to add the gimp module's path to.
Python-specific - you drop a .pth file into Py
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:14:55 +0200
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: The GNU Image Manipulation Program
>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROT
It just feels great.
I t always took me sometime when pointing someone to Preferences to go
to "->FIles->Preferences" and not "->File..."
Thanx Sven!
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/m
>to the number of happy users? We can hardly decide anything unless
>we know the answer to these questions.
>
> I've seen quite a number of people -- Marc, Alastair Robinson, Bill
> Kendrick, Jernej Simoncic, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris, Michael
> Thaler, and myself -- complain more or les
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> It just feels great.
>
> I t always took me sometime when pointing someone to Preferences to go
> to "->FIles->Preferences" and not "->File..."
Well, unfortunately this seems to lead back to the "Why the heck do I
have to open an image to access $feature?" ti
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:13:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I do not disagree with Sven on this. Please do not count me in on
this arguement, I probably should not have commented at all. On
balance the new file chooser is better, it just happens to be worse
So here's a half baked proposal. Make of it what you will. I am
beginning to see why it is quite complicated.
The current file chooser stays the same by default, except that a
label is added somewhere that reads "Type a filename" or whatever (to
give some kind of visual cue that you can type a f
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been contributing suggestions both here and on the
> bugzilla.gnome.org bug (whose number I forget). Yes, it's true that
> my suggestion boils down to "bring back the text entry box!" and not a
> whole lot else. Every time anyone here make
On 6/23/05, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > and I would like to see it replaced with a term that doesn't require
> > > extra localisation work and yes I wouldn't be averse to slapping the
> > > sligh
Hi,
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ ] Default to last-used instead of source directory
Does it really make sense to make this a preference option? Wouldn't
it be better to add a UI that deals explicitely with processing
batches of images? Adding this as a gimprc parameter would p
Hi,
Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, unfortunately this seems to lead back to the "Why the heck do
> I have to open an image to access $feature?" times... and I thought
> these were finally gone.
It is still available from the Toolbox, don't worry.
Sven
__
On 6/23/05, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> > It just feels great.
> >
> > I t always took me sometime when pointing someone to Preferences to go
> > to "->FIles->Preferences" and not "->File..."
>
> Well, unfortunately this seems to lead back t
On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:22, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> > It just feels great.
> >
> > I t always took me sometime when pointing someone to Preferences
> > to go to "->FIles->Preferences" and not
> > "->File..."
>
> Well, unfortunately this seems to lead bac
On 6/23/05, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:22, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Why so? The Preferences entry is still in the ->File menu.
>
> One other possible rearangement would be drop the "dialogs" and
> "prefences" entries into "Xtns" and ren
On Friday 24 June 2005 08:41, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Does it really make sense to make this a preference option?
Really only if you also have a toggle or two on the widget itself to
allow it to be changed on the fly. Or at least a gimprc-configurable
option to _present_ such toggles in the widget
31 matches
Mail list logo
