On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:26:43PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
>
> (from the digest)
>
> Carol wote:
> > or, if you are not using gimp money or gimp people, you can take wilber
> > off the logo and just use the word GIMP instead. wilber and gnome don't
> > have anything to do with each other, do t
(from the digest)
Carol wote:
> or, if you are not using gimp money or gimp people, you can take wilber
> off the logo and just use the word GIMP instead. wilber and gnome don't
> have anything to do with each other, do they?
I'm looking for GIMP people - particularly people who can give visual
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 11:37 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> There will be a number of people who will have trouble finding glib 2.10. I
> just went to the download section of http://www.gtk.org/ and checked the
> download link. It does not mention a 2.10 version at all. It says "The
> current
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: lode leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This was fixed in:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/glib/glib/glib.symbols?r1=1.56&r2=1.57 which
means gimp is depending on glib-2.10 instead of glib-2.8.2 (on windows)
It does depend on 2.10 for some time already, doesn't it? AFAIK
Von: lode leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This was fixed in:
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/glib/glib/glib.symbols?r1=1.56&r2=1.57
> which means gimp is depending on glib-2.10 instead of glib-2.8.2 (on
> windows)
It does depend on 2.10 for some time already, doesn't it? AFAIK GTK+ 2.8
depends Glib
Compiling GIMP-2.3.10 fails on windows
(MSYS/MinGW/gtk-2.8)
the build failed at linking gimp.exe
because g_listenv is not found in glib-2.0
This was fixed in:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/glib/glib/glib.symbols?r1=1.56&r2=1.57
which means gimp is depending on glib-2.10 instead of glib-2.8.2 (on
