You're right, and I appologize for drawing hasty/wrong conclusions, my
prejudices were wrong. Check out this awesome Ruby script though, it
produces some rather interesting output nevertheless.
Martin
:Manish Singh skrev:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:36:52PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>>
Peter,
I'm glad you've become the ambassador for this. Your
description of a loupe is basically what I was
proposing in my original bugzilla proposal #409802 (
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409802 ).
Rather than add another proposal, why not just flesh
out the details of your vision
yep, Gimp's team has its own reputation : not very opened to outside
things. may be this is not completely true, for examplegimp's team has
been opened to join LGM instead of going on with the GimpCons.
I guess nobody is responsible and everyone can be. The fact can Gimp is
a quite huge and com
Hi.
Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It took me 10 minutes to write.
Oh wow. Is it just me or is this really a *lot* of time? Personally I'd
consider answering 6 "lazy questions" per hour a waste of time.
(Sorry for not replying to all of your mail - this just stuck out to me)
Bye,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:21:23 +0100, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
> >> to simply remember the person on the other side is still a human
> >> being, is not
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 10:00 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
> Acually the thing that struck me was that the answer from Mitch
> was not only a little rude (which is unusual for Mitch), it was
> also a bad answer -- it doesn't make sense to download the source
> code just to find out what language it i
Hi Mitch and everybody!
On Tuesday 20 March 2007, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> > It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
> > to simply rememebr the person on the other sidee is sitll a human
> > bei
(oops, sent privately: resending to list)
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:35:30 -0300, "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You see, the GIMP is not exactly with exceeding developer resources,
> and every single person I see trying to approach the project either
> here or over bugzi
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:36:52PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> GIMP is a widely used piece of software, if one compares to other pieces
> of FLOSS, there are often many more contributors at other, similar
> projects. Doesn't anyone find that strange?
I don't believe this is true. Can you back
I really would like to add my point of view to this discussion, sorry
for messing up threading (I had daily digests until just now)
I understand the reply was not in any way meant to be offensive mitch,
but I, as I have stated before on IRC, also think that not very rarely
replies to people who mi
On 3/20/07, Akkana Peck wrote:
> If there's no easy-to-find FAQ document, then is it fair to get mad
> at people for asking FAQs?
Currently gimp.org is in process of redesigning. I think that adding
another todo with regards to FAQ would be one step closer to being
percieved as nice people by mer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Come on, that is simply a rude accusation.
>
> Is it rude? It seems perfectly reasonable and polite to me. Interestingly
> Sven seems to find this highly offensive as well. May be you think taking
> offense somehow negates the criticism. It seems you both are not
Chris,
> First off, I want to apologize - it's not my intention to be
> combative, and I can be a total ass sometimes.
don't worry, I am also fired up about this one. here is why:
people have talked to me a week or more ago on the irc along the
line of: "what's the big deal, one way or another w
Acually the thing that struck me was that the answer from Mitch
was not only a little rude (which is unusual for Mitch), it was
also a bad answer -- it doesn't make sense to download the source
code just to find out what language it is written in.
Now if the first thing that occurs to *Mitch* is
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:21:23 +0100, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
>> to simply remember the person on the other side is still a human
>> being, is not it? Not less human for having less abilities to
>> compil
On 3/19/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We aren't using cairo yet. But I don't see what you would want to use
> gdk_draw_drawable() for.
OK - I have more to learn!
> app/dialogs/dialogs.c, IIRC
Thanks.
Chris
___
Gimp-developer mailing li
There is a practice within OO bugzilla management (at least with some QA
persons) to 1. thank the bug reporter for his work - whether it is
useless from a developer's POV or not. 2. if it is a well-known bug or
the problem should be known from FAQ or other online document, the link
to this docu
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:28:49 +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Simon, where does that forbid one to add words
> > like "thanks", "please", "would" and etc... to even a short answer,
> > like a FAQ URL???
>
> Nothing forbids
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
> to simply rememebr the person on the other sidee is sitll a human
> being, is not it? Not less human for having less abilities to
> compile/hack compli
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 08:11, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > IMHO, refraining from posts like this could greatly improve the
> > > atmosphere of this list.
> > > It is really up to you to help somebody with answering his
> > > question or not to
Von: "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You see, the GIMP is not exactly with exceeding developer resources,
> and every single person I see trying to approach the project either
> here or over bugzilla gets a rude answer that might have turned then
> away for good.
There are can
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> Simon, where does that forbid one to add words
> like "thanks", "please", "would" and etc... to even a short answer,
> like a FAQ URL???
Feel free to add those, no one forbids it. But seriously, the question
was stupid
22 matches
Mail list logo
