Hi Simon!
On Wednesday 21 March 2007, Simon Budig wrote:
> Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Actually I also think it was too rude. Let's analyze it:
>
> [...]
>
> > 1. You didn't say "hi".
>
> Oh, come on. A lot of the mails on mailinglists don't include a greeting
> if quoting something
On Thursday 22 March 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:57:28 +0200, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://perl.net.au/wiki/New_GIMP_FAQ
> >
> > Feel free to fill in more questions and answers. Please keep it under the
> > PD (or fork it).
> >
> > There's not a lot the
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier if you could quickly zoom in (and back out again
> to the previous zoom level) without having to open a new view for this?
> In the SVN version you can already revert to previous zoom level. What's
> the point of doing this in a separate window?
>
Sorry
Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> We do have a list etiquette at http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html. I'd like
> to suggest that it is moved above the mailing lists, maybe it will be read
> more often then.
>
I recently submitted a patch to the gimp-web list addressing this page. I added
a link to t
Akkana Peck wrote:
> Maybe that's the intent -- to set up a gauntlet that weeds out any
> potential participants who might be lazy or thin skinned. If so, no
> problem. But if you actually want lots of new participants, then how
> other people perceive the project matters.
>
I don't think more aut
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 20:57 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Check out:
>
> http://perl.net.au/wiki/New_GIMP_FAQ
>
> Feel free to fill in more questions and answers. Please keep it under the PD
> (or fork it).
What's the purpose of this fork of the FAQ? The GIMP user FAQ
(http://wiki.gimp.org/g
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:57:28 +0200, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://perl.net.au/wiki/New_GIMP_FAQ
>
> Feel free to fill in more questions and answers. Please keep it under the PD
> (or fork it).
>
> There's not a lot there.
Thanks for the effort, but if you had looked at the rec
Check out:
http://perl.net.au/wiki/New_GIMP_FAQ
Feel free to fill in more questions and answers. Please keep it under the PD
(or fork it).
There's not a lot there.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
-
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:02 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the best way to render gimp image to GdkPixbuf (which in turn
> can be rendered to GdkWindow)? The GdkPixbuf would contain the same
> pixels as if they were rendered with Gimp on GdkWindow (display
> filters, color management
Hi, general comments:
The tone of the GIMP mailing list has improved dramatically over the
years (long time lurker here) and I would assert that it is generally
very reasonable.
However, language barriers can cause problems and special care should
be taken when this is obviously the case. Also,
I don't really see the value in having the loupe
possess both the magnified view and the focus view.
Several good points have been brought up The
handle must be shorter and translucent (why not just
eliminate the handle?) ... How will the tool behave at
the window limits (with no handle, this
Hi,
What's the best way to render gimp image to GdkPixbuf (which in turn
can be rendered to GdkWindow)? The GdkPixbuf would contain the same
pixels as if they were rendered with Gimp on GdkWindow (display
filters, color management, etc). In other words, it should "pre-bake"
this stuff. Is it possi
Maybe it worth gathering such a common questions in a FAQ and place the
link to it at the main page of the gimp.org? Unless these common
questions aren't answered at the usual place, they would be asked again
and again.
Sven Neumann wrote:
>But if ten minutes is the required amount of time that
13 matches
Mail list logo
