Hi,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 20:33 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> It already shares focus and minimising with the image window.
> It being a semi-separate window is only good for moving it.
> Moving it is only good for getting to see the whole canvas.
> If it would not cover any part of the canvas,
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Well, you have overlooked the main problem here. If you add user
> interface elements to the image window, then these will cover parts of
> the canvas and there will be no way to unobscure the covered parts. So
> if you think that i
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 16:20 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> No. Either being able to see the canvas is important, in which case
> adding the message and resizing the image window can be better than
> having the user move a window around.
There is nothing more annoying that a window that res
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:29:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> There is nothing more annoying that a window that resizes itself. In
> particular because it is very difficult, if not impossible, to get this
> right with all the various window managers being used by our users. The
> window manage
On 5/20/07, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will try to raise this with the Metacity project.
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/save-changes-integrated-3/
I don't think you want to go too far down this path. A significant
portion of GIMP users run Windows and WMs other than
