Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Once 2.4 is out and there is a review of the interp naming strategy w.r.t.
downscaling the use of NONE should be probably be changed as well. (A
scaled up image with no interpolation has holes in it.)
Even though rather simplistic, N.N _is_ interpolation.
;)
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:53:16 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is overly presumptuous, in my opinion, to declare that labeling
nearest neighbor interpolation as None is an error on the part of
the user interface designers of the GIMP. It may be worthwhile to
propose re-examination of the
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:36:01 +0200, Luis A. Florit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at this for example:
So:
1) Is the EXIF source in the all the 3 cameras (of 3 different
brands) broken?
2) Why all the other graphic programs that I use (showfoto,
gqview, gthumb, exiftool) always
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the conditional should and the uncertainty probably. I'm not
being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
proposing a re-examination and also proposing an alternative that I
consider better.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:57:23 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the conditional should and the uncertainty probably. I'm not
being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
proposing a
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nearest neighbour is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
and readily understood.
IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not
understand its meaning. They also don't understand Linear or
David Gowers wrote:
On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nearest neighbour is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
and readily understood.
IMO it is very technical and the vast
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:34:28 +0200, Geert Jordaens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gowers wrote:
On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nearest neighbour is non technical, very obvious in it's
meaning
Hi Mukund,
Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version = 2.3.18)
needs libexif = 0.6.15, while there is no RPM repository
with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
based distros have the libexif outdated).
Ah good. So there lies your problem :-)
Yes. Thanks for
Hi Sven,
So, yes, I state, publicly, again: this bug has been ignored for
months (in fact, for years, since Fedora 4, and we are now in
Fedora 7). No matter if you let me 'get away' or not.
These bug reports have not been ignored. They are not GIMP bugs and
have been reassigned
10 matches
Mail list logo
