peter sikking wrote:
> Guys,
>
Hello guiguru,
(It was an odd time stamp on your mail. are you back from vacation yet?)
The spec asks for ideas for good default values for the Fixed: Size entries.
How about having 100x100 as default when there is no pending rectangle
and rectangle width x rect
I am not sure you take feature requests like this, - but try to take a look.
It seems quite cool.
I don't know enough about image processing (but I am a software engineer)
but to me it looks like it wouldn't be to hard to implement. Hopefully there
isn't a lot of patens making it impossible
See:
h
Hi. I'm new in gimp development.
few day ago, I checked gimp 2.4 rc1 source, and then I noticed the
l10n file for korean was so terrible. it means translation was not
apply almostly.
so I contacted our tongue translator, and got an answer. "it's for you." :-(
BTW, so I fixed, reassigned, etc..
n
Guys,
the fixed ratio/width/height/size functionality is optimised for
applying that constraint many times over a period of time (all day
long).
You set it up, then you use it for a while.
If you quickly want to set the width/height/size of the bounding
rectangle
then there are the width and
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:34 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> It seems to me as if you describe Fixed: Size simply as a facility to
> lock the current size. That was the case before I started to implement
> guiguru's rectangle tools spec [1], but it's not the case anymore, so
> your argumentatio
Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:34 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> However, with latest svn it's still frustrating:
> (1) open a medium-sized image, e.g. 1000x3000 pixels
> (2) press C to choose crop tool, and drag out a rectangle of
> (say) several hundred pixels on a side
>
Hello Michael,
On 8/21/07, Michael J. Hammel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The trick here isn't creating an extensible plugin. The trick is
> defining what "without much hassle on the part of the end-user" really
> means. Who's the end user? Joe Artist or Edward Engineer? Sven's
> granny or a
Hello Kevin,
On 8/21/07, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Michael mentioned, using a scripting language such as Perl, Python, or Ruby
> would be to do most things you might want to do. If you want to extend a
> compiled plug-in that is also possible.
>
> Take a look at TinyScheme (us
Hello Michael,
On 8/21/07, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
Yes. I am basically targeting end-users of GIMP,mainly GIMP. So
learning Python for them might be not the best
Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
> How about having a C++ virutal interface which you only have to fill in with
> your own methods and GUI elements in a set dialog interface...
> I hav
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible.
[snip]
> I would appreciate even the slightest of insights.
As Michael mentioned, using a scripting language such as Perl, Python, or Ruby
would be to do most things you might want to do. If you want to extend a
> > Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
> > here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
> > by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
> > on part of the end-user.
hi all,
I try to import the project gimp in eclipse (for a work).
but that seems more complicated than I though.
What I made is
the plugin subclipse
made a checkout with it on gimp repository and grap the source code.
Now , I have all source but I have no idea how to compil them with eclipse .
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
How about having a C++ virutal interface which you only have to fill in with
your own methods and GUI elements in a set dialog interface...
I have several things that I really woul
> Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
> here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
> by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
> on part of the end-user. Does any
Hello all,
GIMP plugins extend GIMP, we know that.
Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
on part of the end-user. Does any o
16 matches
Mail list logo
