Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
Hello, I don't know if I should send patches to this list, but anyway,
I think that it's a good place.
We would prefer if you opened one or even several bug reports at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ with a description of the problems you
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
On the other hand, I think that the GFLI plug-in has other problems
(in the gfli.c file).
IMO we should remove this plug-in from the main distribution. It doesn't
seem to be very useful for the main target audience and it appears to
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:55:13 +0100, Bill Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been experimenting with ways of simplifying the user interface,
and
one very simple change that I think gives a rather dramatic improvement
in appearance is to remove the relief from the buttons that appear at
Bill wrote:
I have been experimenting with ways of simplifying the user
interface, and
one very simple change that I think gives a rather dramatic
improvement
in appearance is to remove the relief from the buttons that
appear at
the bottom of numerous dialogs. This is a request for
To follow up for people who don't necessarily look at Bugzilla, this
change has been committed to trunk at Mitch's request, and
Mitch converted it into a style property, defaulting to no relief as
shown in the screenshot, so that, should there happen to be
anybody who wants the button relief, they
On Feb 10, 2008 1:18 PM, peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some deeper problems with those buttons (why are they there,
allt the time, so prominently?), the ones in the layer dialog excepted.
I agree with this. I too think it would be best to have buttons only
for the
Bill wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
There are some deeper problems with those buttons (why are they
there,
allt the time, so prominently?), the ones in the layer dialog
excepted.
I agree with this. I too think it would be best to have buttons only
for the layers/channels/paths dialogs,
On Feb 10, 2008 4:16 PM, peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
right-click is a shortcut for a primary way to do things. So in
this case I see good chances for the not-so-often-used options
to go in their own little menu that gets accessed from a
small-no-relief-low-contrast-icon button in
Hi,
On Feb 11, 2008 9:29 AM, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You aren't perhaps working with an image in Indexed mode, are you?
Yes, my fault.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
The patch is for this specific file:
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gimp/trunk/plug-ins/gfli/fli.c
It fixes two problems:
* loading of fli files that specified width=height=0 (that means 320x200)
Where is this specified?
* writing of
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:00 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
I just installed gimp 2.4.4 for Windows from binary distribution. Now,
setting blending opacity = 50 results in full opacity, otherwise - no
opacity.
You aren't perhaps working with an image in Indexed mode, are you?
Sven
11 matches
Mail list logo
