Re: [Gimp-developer] is watercolor (brush color blending mode)...

2008-07-26 Thread Souichi TAKASHIGE
Hi, >> 1.is this going to be avaiable in some of the 2.5 releases, because if >> it is,i'm gonna bug tests it > No, it is not going to be available in 2.5, unless you fix the patch > or persuade Souichi Takashige to do so. Sorry, I'm currently working on another program, so I have not maintained

Re: [Gimp-developer] is watercolor (brush color blending mode)...

2008-07-26 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 00:28 +0200, Theodore Imre wrote: > ... > is watercolor (brush color blending mode) going to be avaiable in > gimp's development version? In the short term, the "Krita" program (part of KDE) does have some colour mixing. > Do you have any idea how badly a graphic artist w

Re: [Gimp-developer] is watercolor (brush color blending mode)...

2008-07-26 Thread David Gowers
Hi Theodore, On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Theodore Imre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > is watercolor (brush color blending mode) going to be avaiable in > gimp's development version? I dont see why its not there,while it has > already been implemented back in 2.4 (Sakaguchi's work) Sakag

Re: [Gimp-developer] is watercolor (brush color blending mode)...

2008-07-26 Thread Bill Skaggs
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Theodore Imre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... It's unpleasant when people take this sort of angry and demanding tone for free software that they haven't contributed to. It's hard to give a calm response without feeling like a wimp. -- Bill ___

[Gimp-developer] is watercolor (brush color blending mode)...

2008-07-26 Thread Theodore Imre
... is watercolor (brush color blending mode) going to be avaiable in gimp's development version? I dont see why its not there,while it has already been implemented back in 2.4 (Sakaguchi's work) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIg8Omew9Ps http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berk

Re: [Gimp-developer] need help with bug #464466 (downscaling quality)

2008-07-26 Thread Geert Jordaens
David Gowers wrote: > Hello. I've just completed the first half of the set (all specified > results before the patch). Currently image files total 66mb, I'm > guessing after adding the results after-patch this will come up to > ~110mb. During this testing I found one obvious bug, it remains to be >