2008/8/29 Alexia Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After an idea on IRC (thanks Martin!) the text on it got reworked into this:
> http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash3.png that seems better.
That looks really nice! One thing I suggest is to make the GIMP logo a
bit brighter, I don't think it stands out qu
After an idea on IRC (thanks Martin!) the text on it got reworked into this:
http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash3.png that seems better.
On Friday 29 August 2008 23:26:57 Alexia Death wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that there was a lack of splashes for 2.6 so I made one for an
> option. Here it is for
Hi,
I noticed that there was a lack of splashes for 2.6 so I made one for an
option. Here it is for your appraisal: http://a.death.pri.ee/gimp-splash2.png
Best,
Alexia
PS: This is a photo manipulation, not a painting. The base image is a photo of
a sand sculpture altered with some processing a
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 14:15 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I also started to play with some enhancements on top of the patch we are
> discussing here. Using a steep gaussian filter instead of the plain box
> filter seems to be a good compromise. It's better at suppressing Moire
> patterns, at t
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:38 +0200, Geert Jordaens wrote:
>
>
>> What are your doubts with the new code? Why would a simple box-filter be
>> better for decimating?
>>
>
> My doubts with the current approach are manifold:
>
> The current code has decimation
Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>
>> As already explained in my previous mail, the decimation routines are
>> only used for the pre-scaling steps. As soon as the image is close
>> enough to the final size, the chosen interpolation routine is used. This
>> gives continu
Hi
Sven Neumann wrote:
> As already explained in my previous mail, the decimation routines are
> only used for the pre-scaling steps. As soon as the image is close
> enough to the final size, the chosen interpolation routine is used. This
> gives continuous results for all scale factors as there
Hi,
I also started to play with some enhancements on top of the patch we are
discussing here. Using a steep gaussian filter instead of the plain box
filter seems to be a good compromise. It's better at suppressing Moire
patterns, at the cost of introducing a little blur. I have not yet
finished th
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:38 +0200, Geert Jordaens wrote:
> What are your doubts with the new code? Why would a simple box-filter be
> better for decimating?
My doubts with the current approach are manifold:
The current code has decimation routines, but they are only suited for
the speci
