Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-19 Thread Laxminarayan Kamath
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Hi, > > With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that > allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and > gradients). This enables us to add a bigger set of default resources. I would re-suggest

Re: [Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-19 Thread SHIRAKAWA Akira
Martin Nordholts wrote: [cut] > Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the > default set of GIMP resources? I have a few suggestions as a creative/artistic user which uses GIMP mainly with a pen tablet (as probably any other people who is serious into raster graphic ar

[Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

2009-07-19 Thread Martin Nordholts
Hi, With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and gradients). This enables us to add a bigger set of default resources. Not being an artist myself makes me rather useless for this task. To get things r

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] GEGL-0.1.0

2009-07-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 15:21 -0700, David Evans wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > Note to all users of GIMP 2.6: The gimp-2.6 releases that we have done > > so far will not work with GEGL 0.1.0 (or babl 0.1.0). This is not > > because GEGL would be incompatible, but rather because of a stupid bu

Re: [Gimp-developer] API proposal for libgimp export dialog

2009-07-19 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 07/18/2009 09:10 PM, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > The semantics of gimp_export_image() are complete crap (I wrote this > code in the first place, so I have the right to say that). So let's not > make this error worse by introducing a new function that has the same > broken semantics. If you rea