[Gimp-developer] are there other occurences of the %s part of "_Undo %s" ?

There are several strings that become part of these strings: _Undo %s _Redo %s _Fade %s... My question is if those strings that replaces %s are unique for this combination, or they may appear in other places too. I am asking this related to ranslation, because I need to know if I can treat the %s

Re: [Gimp-developer] are there other occurences of the %s part of "_Undo %s" ?

On 09/20/2009 09:56 AM, Cristian Secară wrote: > There are several strings that become part of these strings: > _Undo %s > _Redo %s > _Fade %s... > > My question is if those strings that replaces %s are unique for this > combination, or they may appear in other places too. Hi, No, there is no gu

[Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

>jolie wrote: > >>> >> > >> >> Read your blog twice and think all the ideas are great. > >ah, thanks. > >> Commented there too but that was before I read it for the second time. >> >> An idea occurred to me. When you tear of

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:30 PM, jolie S wrote: > Also I've slept on it and given it some more thought and I'd like to ask > again if you would please give having multiple images open at the same time > some more thought. > IMO being able to work on more images at the same time is VITAL for a > pr

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:51 +0930, David Gowers wrote: > Perhaps a split-panel option for single window mode would resolve > this. (I believe we could still only reasonably show a maximum of 2 > images at once; this is simply a limitation of the single-window > format AFAICS.) Do you mean that th

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote: > For me the big difference is usability. > When I work in GIMP what happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next > to a window of an image I'm working on and all my GIMP windows are not shown > on my screen anymore because I activate

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:51 +0930, David Gowers wrote: > >> Perhaps a split-panel option for single window mode would resolve >> this. (I believe we could still only reasonably show a maximum of 2 >> images at once; this is simply a limitatio

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:36:36 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E4tsi?= On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote: > For me the big difference is usability. When I work in GIMP what > happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next to a window > of an image

[Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

>On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:30 PM, jolie S wrote: >> Also I've slept on it and given it some more thought and I'd like to ask >> again if you would please give having multiple images open at the same time >> some more thought. >> IMO being able to work on more images at the same time is VITAL for a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Peter's single-window proposal (Was: We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8)

Daniel Hornung wrote: > I'm not planning to dive deeply into this discussion, but I feel > that Peter's > blog deserves its own thread. OK, I am picking up the thread here. as I just commented on the blog post, I am going to address this need for windows-in-window and work-side-by-side stru

Re: [Gimp-developer] Peter's single-window proposal (Was: We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8)

> this means first finding out the user requirements behind these > requests. > > so for everybody who feels this: _why_ do you need windows-in-window or > work-side-by-side? I've been reading both the blog posts, and the many discussions here on the mailing list, mainly as an interested user of G

Re: [Gimp-developer] Peter's single-window proposal (Was: We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8)

On Sunday 20 September 2009, peter sikking wrote: > so for everybody who feels this: why do you need windows-in-window or > work-side-by-side? First of all a great idea to get some more feedback. I have one thing for which I had wished for side by side windows recently: When working on the layer

[Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:36:36 +0300 > From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E4tsi?= > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote: > > For me the big difference is usability. When I work in GIMP what > > happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next to a window > > of a

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:00 +0200, jolie S wrote: > > When I work in GIMP what happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next > to a window of an image I'm working on and all my GIMP windows are not shown > on my screen anymore because I activated the application I had visibly open > below t

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

Hi Jolie, On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote: > When I work in GIMP what happens to me quite a lot is that I click > just next to a window of an image I'm working on and all my GIMP > windows are not shown on my screen anymore because I activated the > application I had visibl

Re: [Gimp-developer] Bug #164774

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:09 AM, peter sikking wrote: >> You can already do this with guides - just drag them from the rulers. > > I was aiming for this without involving rulers... Indeed it can be done. Scribus for one has a Manage Guides dialog that allows: 1. Adding/Removing single h/v guides

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

Hi Peter, On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:26:10PM +0200, peter sikking wrote: > I have now blogged about the single-window mode: > > Great ideas! I won't be a single-window mode user, mainly because my window manager doesn't suck

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 23:49 -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote: > (I also use focus-follows mouse and no-autoraise :) ) Interesting to see the focus-follows-mouse and no-autoraise combination mentioned several times. In contrast, I use focus-follows-mouse with autoraise (with 0 delay). It allows me to ha

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:26 PM, peter sikking wrote: > hey guys, > > I have now blogged about the single-window mode: > > Peter, I'm afraid this is not going to work for a lot of users. Let's start with a mission statement:

Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > For developers: CurlyAnkles gtk+ lib has tab/tile widgets I'm talking > about: URL. Eeek, here is the missing URL: http://curlyankles.sourceforge.net/widgets_docking.html Alexandre ___ Gimp