On 06/23/2010 10:54 AM, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
> When the boundaries of the "group layer" are modified, the result is
> that each of the member layers are cropped to the new boundaries. This
> is not what I would expect to happen. I should think that the "group
> layer's" bo
hi,
I am very very thankful for your help!!!
After 3 days working, I already done this job!
Without your help, I wont finish it. Thx so much!
--
Bear
2010-06-26
-
From:Bill Skaggs
Send Date:
Quoting Martin Nordholts :
> The group layer boundaries are just legacy, we don't want them at all,
> and it would thus be a bad idea to implement functionality that depends
> on the existence of (explicit) layer group boundaries, like adding a
> "Fit group canvas to layers" button. The (implicit)
On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Gino D wrote:
> After doing several tests, my impression is that such a stratagem
> should work well. Nevertheless, I'm not totally sure of its
> infallibility, because, among other things, I don't know if the
> character “!” is really the first valid symbol on all o
