On 12 August 2010 03:19, Rupert Weber wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not a color buff. Anybody who actually *knows* about
> that stuff, please chime in.
I'm hardly a color buff either, but I'm going to chime in with a related query:
My understanding of GEGL (and, I assume, a fully GEGL-based GIMP) is
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 06:04:36 David Gowers wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, GSR - FR
>> > wrote: GIMP is a jerk (I get
>> > cases where I draw a
> Disclaimer: I am not a color buff. Anybody who actually *knows* about
> that stuff, please chime in.
>
> PAL/SECAM vs sRGB
> =
> While writing the Lab/LCH layer mode stuff, I wondered so far why the
> result is still slightly different from the current GEGL implementation
> of Col
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 06:04:36 David Gowers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, GSR - FR
> > wrote: GIMP is a jerk (I get
> > cases where I draw a curve and the middle of it gets flattened into a
> > straig
Hi,
On 11.08.2010 19:19, Rupert Weber wrote:
> PAL/SECAM vs sRGB
> =
> While writing the Lab/LCH layer mode stuff, I wondered so far why the
> result is still slightly different from the current GEGL implementation
> of Color/Hue/Saturation/Value modes.
>
> Now after taking a quick
Rupert Weber (g...@leguanease.org) wrote:
> D50 vs D65
> ==
> Another question during transformation to Lab is, which illuminant or
> reference white to use.
>
> That part, I don't quite understand yet. Does that depend on the source
> data, or simply on how the monitor is calibrated?
W
Disclaimer: I am not a color buff. Anybody who actually *knows* about
that stuff, please chime in.
PAL/SECAM vs sRGB
=
While writing the Lab/LCH layer mode stuff, I wondered so far why the
result is still slightly different from the current GEGL implementation
of Color/Hue/Satur
