Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> I have made several optimizations in loading script-fu extension making the
> loading process a bit faster.
Thank you for the patches. They will be reviewed son. I can't look at them
for another day or two as I'm finishing up some changes on another project.
I would as
On 09/01/2010 02:37 AM, Rupert Weber wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 09:34 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>>> Is it decided that GEGL will not support the legacy modes, or should
>>> they be implemented in GEGL as well to retain backward compatability?
>>
>> There is one big issue left to settle
>>
> I just
On 08/30/2010 09:34 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Is it decided that GEGL will not support the legacy modes, or should
>> they be implemented in GEGL as well to retain backward compatability?
>
> There is one big issue left to settle: whether e.g. a Screen pixel
> composited onto nothing should r
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:18 +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> Passing a string literal directly to g_message() is also not a
> good
> idea. Please use g_message("%s", message) instead. But I
> didn't
> understand what this part of your patch is trying to ach
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 14:18 +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> >
> > Passing a string literal directly to g_message() is also not a good
> > idea. Please use g_message("%s", message) instead. But I didn't
> > understand what this part of your patch is trying to achieve.
> >
>
> Why it's not a good
Hello,
W dniu 31 sierpnia 2010 00:39 użytkownik Sven Neumann napisał:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 23:31 +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>
>
> > I have made several optimizations in loading script-fu extension
> > making the loading process a bit faster. It's the first time I change
> > something in a
