On 09/20/2010 10:51 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 22:18 +0200, fu...@gmx.net wrote:
>>> GIMP can't load or save any file format except XCF without separate
>>> plug-ins. So by your definition of "native support" GIMP doesn't support
>>> any file formats except XCF. Most features i
lloyd konneker wrote:
> An alternative in Python is to bracket a call to gimp_display_new() with
> try:except:, but there is no such alternative in Scheme.
Scheme has the "catch" and "throw" statements. There are some simple notes
about them in the script-fu.init file but that is about it for the
This proposes enhancing PDB gimp_display_new() to successfully return a
null display when non-interactive, and enhancing PDB gimp_display_delete
to return success even for a null display.
Most scripts (Python and Scheme) that call gimp_display_new() abort the
script when run in batch mode. The pr
Quoting "Joao S. O. Bueno" :
> Oliver -
>
> this rant has no reason to be. Sorry for that.
I disagree. Oliver has politely raised an issue to be discussed and
presents some valid points.
GIMP is nearly a million lines of code -- well over a million if you
take into account GEGL and BABL. If
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 22:18 +0200, fu...@gmx.net wrote:
> > GIMP can't load or save any file format except XCF without separate
> > plug-ins. So by your definition of "native support" GIMP doesn't support
> > any file formats except XCF. Most features in GIMP are implemented as
> > plug-ins. So I d
> GIMP can't load or save any file format except XCF without separate
> plug-ins. So by your definition of "native support" GIMP doesn't support
> any file formats except XCF. Most features in GIMP are implemented as
> plug-ins. So I don't see your point in asking us to add RAW support to
> the cor
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:31:07PM +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, wrote:
> >> Oliver -
> >>
> >> this rant has no reason to be. Sorry for that.
> >> It makes no sense to start working in a project the size of GIMP
> >> without having to learn the code already in th
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> ... GEGL will also use third-party libraries to read and
> write RAW files. We are certainly not going to reinvent the wheel.
GEGL already supports using dcraw to load raw files using the
operations gegl:raw-load uses the dcraw binary, readin
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 01:11 +0200, fu...@gmx.net wrote:
> Without the requirement of installing separate software/plug-ins.
GIMP can't load or save any file format except XCF without separate
plug-ins. So by your definition of "native support" GIMP doesn't support
any file formats except XCF. Most
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, wrote:
>> Oliver -
>>
>> this rant has no reason to be. Sorry for that.
>> It makes no sense to start working in a project the size of GIMP
>> without having to learn the code already in there first.
> [...]
>
> I didn't say people should not look into the code.
On 9/20/10, oliver wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> [...]
>> The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some
>> can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the
>> team. Which the team doesn't seem to have righ
On 20 September 2010 15:10, wrote:
> Is this is not addressed, then it makes no sense to
> mourn about shorthanded and outnumbered developers.
>
You're more than welcome to address the issue.
--
Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com
___
Gimp-developer m
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:25:12AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > [...]
> >> The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some
> >> can-opener library will l
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> [...]
>> The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some
>> can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the
>> team. Which the team doesn't s
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
> The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some
> can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the
> team. Which the team doesn't seem to have right now, being heavily
> shorthande
On 9/20/10, fufuz wrote:
> I read on the Internet, that GEGL will provide support for many raw format
> types of different camera manufacturers already by itself
Where I come from people say that the only thing that happens by
itself is newborn kittens :)
GEGL already uses libopenraw library tha
On 9/19/10, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> UFRAW has a nice GIMP plug-in that has full RAW processing features. Not
> sure why it is necessary to reinvent the wheel.
There are different ways to deal with RAW images. A well-known
proprietary analog of GIMP :) comes with a plug-in that takes care or
doing
17 matches
Mail list logo
