I am taking a stab at my first contribution in the form of an improvement to an existing file saving plugin. I have discovered how the plugin specifies which types of images it can handle (INDEXED*, GRAY*) but I have a small problem. Currently a dialog appears to asks if the image should be conve
On 4/16/06, Frédéric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I successfully compiled gimp-cvs under my debian testing, but withoutgimp-print support.What do I need to install to get it ? I can't find any gimp-print-dev or sopackage...I believe libgimpprint1-dev is the package that you need
(sorry Frederic for t
Just throwing it out there... It might be cool to have a stand split between the main LGM projects (GIMP, Blender, Inkscape, Scribus, Xara).On 5/10/06, Dave Neary
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:There's a decent possibility of having a stand very cheap (proper island stand,
partially sponsored, in the
1) What does GIMP stand for?2) What does GNU stand for?50% is a passing score. 100% qualifies for Advanced rating.On 5/12/06, Olafur Arason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I think Gimp should have something like Adobe Certified Expert.
This would ensure that gimp trained individuals could showthat they
On 6/15/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Making the art greyscale is a matter of running:
`mogrify -colorspace gray *png`
This is not the optimal approach. An exact greyscale conversion such
as this loses many details of color contrast. For example a smooth
Red->Blue gradient wil
Are we intentionally not having the version number in the art?
On 12/13/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen
> for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished
> and not super-se
On 12/14/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 17:21 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
> > Seems like tradition, every splash I can remember except 1.0 had a
> > version number. The wording on the rules doesnt require it, but it
> > seems to
The screenshot delay behaves exactly as I have always expected it to.
If you select immediately and then wait 5 seconds, how do you change
virtual desktops to get to the window in question without
'accidentally' selecting your pager? Then again, I have often desired
a feature do what you propose h
On 1/28/07, Steve Stavropoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only use of "delay before selecting" I have heard so far is to
> change desktops before grabbing, but for me the "logical" thing to do
> in that case would be to move the screenshot plugin to the desktop I
> wanted and take the screen
On 1/30/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to propose a user interface that fits all needs.
imho, the 2.2 interface met all needs. i have yet to hear any reason
for eliminating either option, other than removing ONE element from
the screenshot GUI.
(sorry for the dupe email Sven)
On 1/30/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 02:26 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
> > On 1/30/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > to propose a user interface that fits all needs.
> >
> > imho, the 2.2 interf
On 1/30/07, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the fact that it is a piece of cake to cut out a rectangle
>out of a image in GIMP, or two added rectangles (window +
>menu sticking out).
For the record, windows are not always rectangular, or do not always
fill their bounding box.
On 1/30/07, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clarence Risher wrote:
> > On 1/30/07, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - the fact that it is a piece of cake to cut out a rectangle
> > >out of a image in GIMP, or two added rectangl
On 1/31/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 19:09 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
>
> > Sven's argument is true, but does not address my point. In every case
> > like this the process will be more complex than just
On 1/31/07, Alexander Rabtchevich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When Gimp 2.3.14 for Windows saves image, it doesn't create a thumbnail
> for it.
To clarify, which thumbnail are you talking about? A GIMP file
browser preview? A JPEG internal thumbnail? A Windows Explorer
thumbnail?
_
On 2/5/07, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I'd rather have the screenshooter be a separate application.
> There is a good number of efficient workflows using existing tools
> (`sleep 5 && import (-window root) ~/Desktop/foo.png` [1],
> `gnome-panel-screenshot --delay 5 (--wind
On 3/16/07, Morgan Christiansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i have a friend who's just migrating off windows and is currently
> running Ubuntu which he's generally happy with.
>
>
> He complained about "save for web" functionality missing from the stock
> GIMP and had some good points on why
On 6/26/07, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please don't forget other users :-) I routinely have a selection
> > that's, say, 10,000 pixels by roughly 40 pixels. This might not
> > be a usual case for Web graphics...
>
> an aspect ratio of 1000 to 4. cool.
>
> at what zoom level(s) d
18 matches
Mail list logo
