On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:51:10PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:29 +0100, David Odin wrote:
>
> > >
> > Still that narrow minded? You obviously didn't read the drizzt's post
> > at all! Drizzt was comparing the linux
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:02:13PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:52 -0700, drizzt wrote:
>
> > Just think of the most used piece of code on a GNU/Linux system: the Linux
> > kernel. Didn't you know that the user interface is stable ?
> > How would you feel if betwe
Today, the gimp community has lost yet another contributor. Me. I'm
really fed up with the attitude of some here (Enselic, yes, I'm looking
at you...)
Gimp is really in need of more contributors, but before trying to even
find new ones, maybe you should try to keep the few you have.
I'm qu
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:22:11PM -0300, Monica Kraenzle wrote:
>
> The users manual version we used is for gimp 2.4, dated December 2007.
>
> I have uploaded a reduced pdf to show the cover and the interior pages:
> http://www.maxishare.net/en/file/8416/gimp-manual-2-4-reduced-pdf.html
>
> Bas
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:19:09PM +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
> > From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In the real world I live in, I have yet to see a transparent
> > pencil.
>
> Wish granted -- simply use your finger (I assume you thought of glass
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know GIMP has alpha channel and it provides transparency. However it
> is artificial for me that you have colors and then you have distinct
> entity -- transparency. It would be useful (and _intuitive_) to have
>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 07:38:33AM -0700, vabijou2 wrote:
>
>
>
> Bernhard Stockmann wrote:
> >
> > ...I wanted to suggest that if
> > someone double clicks the main window (the one that is displayed if no
> > other image is opened) the "new image" dialog should open.
> >
>
> How would you p
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:07:25PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:00:58PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> >
> > The dates for the next GimpCon are march 17h-18th-19th 2006.
> >
> > Please have a look at http://wiki.gimp.org/GimpCon and confirm if y
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:00:58PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The dates for the next GimpCon are march 17h-18th-19th 2006.
>
> Please have a look at http://wiki.gimp.org/GimpCon and confirm if you
> will come as soon as possible,
>
Sorry, the correct link is
Hi,
The dates for the next GimpCon are march 17h-18th-19th 2006.
Please have a look at http://wiki.gimp.org/GimpCon and confirm if you
will come as soon as possible,
Cheers,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D[4],n,d,*T,l,L;main(i,v)char**v;{if(i<3)return;L=atoi(v[1]);l=atoi(v[2]);T=
a
ine, erase it, draw another
line. Don't tell me this takes too much time to check.
> I have started to David Odin offlist about it further.
The mail you send me only shown you're not following the current gfig
development as gfig *does* already use a GtkUIManager toolbar.
>
> [1]
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:29:58PM +0100, Karine Proot wrote:
> David Odin wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >2 Normal.
> > 2.1 The undo button should be moved to the toolbar.
> > 2.2 The 'select object' tool seems useless, and might be removed.
> > 2.3 F
Hi,
As you may know the gfig plug-in was in bad shape, and I've been working
on it for a few weeks. Still, there are some issues. I've tried to make
a list (ordered by severity):
1 Major.
1.1 deleting an object, by using the delete tool or even undo mess up
the current_style variable an
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:51:26PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> (I really hope Gfig will be rolled back as the developer working on it has
> previously suggested, it is definately not ready for 2.2)
>
Thanks for your help. AFAIK, I'm the only one really working on gfig
for now. It isn't read
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:48:02PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100
> > From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:06:21PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> I noticed the Canvas background colour options under the Image menu in the
> gimp 2.2.
>
> In gimp 2.0 this option was fairly discrete and was available on the top
> right just above the scrollbar which seemed fair enough even if it
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:25:27PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> Through this e-mail I am formally asking the GIMP team to be granted
> with some bugzilla privileges.
>
> I do not know which level of privileges are there, but I'd like to be
> able to mark bugs as duplic
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:35:17PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> Newsprint plug-in is working fine now.
>
> Sorry for not replying you earlier. I just rubilt the GIMPyesterday,
> and I was lost on the broken-plug-ins-with-gcc-3.3 mess.
>
> :-)
You should really upgrade to 3.4,
Hi,
The gfig plug-in has been easily modified between 2.0 and now. I
think it is much more usable now than before, but there are some points
that must be fixed before we could ship it in a stable release. I've
tried to make a list, and I will certainly open a bugreport about this,
but I wo
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 07:20:03PM -0400, Thierry Pierron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone explain basic steps to get bitmap of the selection mask of gimp
> inside a plugin ?
>
> I try to play with gimp_image_get_selection(), passing the current image ID,
> but it always returns -1.
>
> Any examp
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:23:10PM +0200, geert jordaens wrote:
>
> why not just using GimpPreviewArea in a frame? :
> Well applying a plugin on a 3000*2000 pixel image could take a lot of time.
> Making the preview scrollable and applying the effect on the "viewable"
> part solves most of the t
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:42:18PM +0200, geert jordaens wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm trying to catch up with the changes concerning the preview widget
> Could somebody explain me why the functions
>
> gimp_preview_area_menu_popup
> gimp_preview_area_menu_new
> gimp_preview_area_menu_toggled
>
> ar
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a while ago we decided for a feature freeze for GIMP 2.2 that should
> have taken effect last week. I haven't enforced this feature freeze
> yet because there's been some good hacking going on recently and I
> think we definit
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 06:42:43PM +0300, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 11:41 +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > Imho, the later is nicer, but Sven told me it could make the scrolling
> > and panning of the main image window much slower.
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the same way you can change the padding color now. i would not have
> > been able to imagine such an interface to the previews without all those
> > new options for customizing
Hi,
You all know that the gimp is using a checkerboard to show the transparency
of some parts of images. This checkerboard has always been fixed with
repect to the image. That is, if you scroll a zoomed-in image, the
checkerboard is scrolled with the image.
If you have played with the plug-i
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:17:47PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan wrote:
> > The Gimp has won the Linux Journal Editors choice Award for Best
> > Graphics software, they seemed particularly pleased by the improved
> > EXIF support.
>
> Cool :) With the OSI award, and the O'Reilly
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:06:58AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
>
> Hi Zack,
>
> Quoting Zack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The first is, how intimately is the GIMP tied to GTK+?
>
> Very. Although the GUI code has been separated out from the internals, the GIMP
> depends on GTK+ to a huge extent. It is
Hi all,
I just wanted to thanks every one who's came to the Guadec-2004 in
Kristiansand. It really has been a great time meeting you, and I was
kind of proud assisting to our meeting with many of the great names of
the Gimp.
Also I would like to thanks all of you who has been patient enough t
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:25:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We should just say that GTK+ 2.4 is not out yet, and we can't base
> > stable software on an unstable toolkit. Especially since we've been in
> > a pre-release freeze for 3 mo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:46:16PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > think we can get GIMP into shape for 2.0rc1 until sunday. Since this
> > will involve quite some hacking, we should IMO do a 2.0rc1 tarball but
> > the idea is that unless there are major problems w
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:51:28PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyway, this isn't clear in my mind for now. I'll propose a draft
> > on this list as soon as I have more valuable thing to show.
&g
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:02:37PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It looks so. While it is true that GtkPreview has been deprecated
> > without a replacement widget without a good reason (in my opinion, and
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > To be more precise, since the GTK+ team has deprecated GtkPreview,
> > I would have like to see if the gimp couldn't have its own widget
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:16:28PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> >Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>As a matter of interest, why do we not simply take the old GtkPreview
> >>code an rename it GimpPreview, put it in libgimpwidgets and use that?
> >>Just wonde
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:38:33PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
>
> >>5) Preview widget to replace GimpOldPreview
> >
> >That's a rather large change. If we get someone interested and a
> >proposal for an implementation is posted early enough, then it should
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:32:50AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:41:46AM +0100, David Odin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as you may know, the files libgimp/gimpmisc.[ch] have been split into
> > libgimp/gimppixelfetcher.[ch] and lib
Hi,
as you may know, the files libgimp/gimpmisc.[ch] have been split into
libgimp/gimppixelfetcher.[ch] and libgimp/gimpregioniterator.[ch]. Can
you do the necessary changes to keep cvs history for these files? This
is something like copying gimpmisc.c,v and gimpmisc.h,v directly on the
CV
Hi,
Just to let you know and to avoid duplicate work, I'm currently fixing
the plugindetails plug-in so it won't use the deprecated gtkctree and
gtkclist widgets.
Regards,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c,r;main(){for(--r;38-r;c++){if(c>r){r++;puts("");for(c=39-r;--c;)
prin
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:52:41PM -0800, Robin Rowe wrote:
> GIMP on Mac OS X without X11:
>
> http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/docs/gimp.html
>
Yeah! Good job. Now, it would be great if you managed to do the same
for gimp-1.3.x. If all the necessary libs were ported too, we could even
consider
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:26:03PM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot compile the cvs as libgimp/gimpmiscui.h has gone ..
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/
> gtk-2
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:18:11PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The rent for the rooms and the lunch at 12:00 might be paid by some
> > presentations made by one of us to the CPE's students.
>
&
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:20:49PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up from the mail last week discussing the date and
> location of GIMPCon, here's the state of play on the various
> possibilities discussed.
>
I will only respond about the "Lyon" possibility:
> snip.
>
> 2) L
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:27:31PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> No vacancy here
>
> On Sunday 23 November 2003 13:56, David Odin wrote:
>
> >
> > gimpmiscui.h also defines the gimp_plug_in_get_path() function
> > which is only used by the FractalExplorer,
Hi,
As you may know, one of the "blocker" bug for the future 2.0 release is
bugzilla bug #125141: deprecation of gimpmisc/gimpmiscui.
Most of the functions of gimpmiscui.h are related to the
GimpFixmePreview stuff. This part looks pretty useful to me, and the API
is clean enough to be kept i
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:28:09PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may know, GimpDialog from libgimpwidgets badly needs an
> API change for GIMP 2.0.
>
> The relevant bugzilla entry:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125143
>
> The plan is to just remove our own action_
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I got a mail from David Odin proposing to work on some of the API
> > clean-up (specifically, he proposed addressing the gimp_dialog_new
> &g
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:39:58PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suggest to create that branch immediately after the 1.3.21 release.
> > What do you think?
>
> We create a branch immidiately after 2.0 is released. We don't have
> the reso
Hi,
Currently in CVS HEAD, selecting the clone tool makes gimp segfault.
I don't understand all the issues, but this patch fix the segfault:
--- gimpclonetool.c 21 Apr 2002 07:30:53 - 1.90
+++ gimpclonetool.c 24 Apr 2002 19:44:42 -
@@ -172,13 +172,13 @@
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 10:20:40PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-04-04 at 1942.21 +0200):
> > I have a question about this limitation: why the Gimp spline curves is
> > limited to 17 entries and the procedure gimp-curves-spline use a 32
> > items arra
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> surely a lot of people want to help with GIMP-1.3 but don't know where
> to start. I'd like to point you to some places that list TODOs for
> GIMP-1.3.
>
> First, we have TODO.xml which is in CVS and available online at:
>
Hi,
I've just discovered a segfault bug in the current HEAD CVS gimp.
To activate the bug: start gimp, select some rectangle area, use the
move tool, bang!
Here is the gdb trace:
coruscant:/export3/Gimp/gimp$ gdb gimp-1.3
GNU gdb 5.1
Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 03:47:50PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The following patch add a "threshold" to the magnify tool.
> > This threshold is between 1 and 15 (adjustable in the tool option box)
>
Hi,
The following patch add a "threshold" to the magnify tool.
This threshold is between 1 and 15 (adjustable in the tool option box)
and default to 5.
If the user mouse the mouse by less than this threshold, a simple zoom
(with a scale of 1) is performed, else a window-zoom is performed.
It
Continuing Dave Neary's thread.
My current work on gimp is very small. I'm reading the sources, looking
for typos, small bugs or obvious optimisations. i'm also use CVS gimp on
a regular basis (my art work isn't very important, so I don't care
loosing my datas here) in order to catch bugs.
Wh
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:34:27PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have tried to keep the CVS version of GIMP compileable with the
> latest releases of GTK+ and friends as well as with the current state
> of these modules in CVS. The latest (small) changes in glib break
> source compat
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 08:09:19PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK. I've attached a similar patch for the gif plugin. It does
> > basically the same thing as my patch for the jpeg plugin (repla
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:41:14PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've attached a patch that allow the compilation (and installation) of
> > the jpeg plugin. It uses a GtkTextVie
Hi,
I've attached a patch that allow the compilation (and installation) of
the jpeg plugin. It uses a GtkTextView/GtkTextBuffer couple instead of
the deprecated GtkText for the image comment.
Well, to use this patch, you'll also have to remove the '#' in front
of the jpeg plugin d
Hi,
You'll find a patch for the gimp/po/fr.po file attached to this mail. I
hope this is the right list for this.
Regards,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a light heart lives long.
-- Shakespeare, "Love's Labour's Lost"
--- gimp/po/fr.po.orig Wed Aug 29 0
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:42:20AM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:38:57PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm using current HEAD cv
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:38:57PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> I'm using current HEAD cvs of the Gimp.
> I've seen that all the filter plugins which use a GTK interface are
> crashing. Is this a known bug and is this due to the switch to the
>
Hi,
I'm using current HEAD cvs of the Gimp.
I've seen that all the filter plugins which use a GTK interface are
crashing. Is this a known bug and is this due to the switch to the
version 2.0 of gtk+? Is there anything I can do to help fixing this?
I've notice that plugins use gtk_signal* f
Hi,
A very small an unimportant patch, to correct a typo in a comment in
the bzip2 plugins (too much cut & paste?):
--- gimp/plug-ins/common/bz2.c.orig Wed Aug 22 00:47:18 2001
+++ gimp/plug-ins/common/bz2.c Wed Aug 22 00:48:49 2001
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
tmpname = gimp_temp_name (ext +
Hi,
I've sent this before, but the gimp's source tree changes too fast...
This patch basically fix some function prototype which are said to
return gint when they really return gboolean. I know this is not that
important, but imho, gimp's sources look better with this patch ;-).
Please apply
Hi,
I was looking in the gimp sources, and noticed some mixes between gint
and gboolean.
Here is a patch witch fixes all those I found.
Regards,
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recursive : adj, see recursive
gboolean.patch.bz2
Hi,
By lurking into the gimp sources, I've noticed a small typo in
app/preferences_dialog.c (today's cvs)
Here is a patch fixing this:
-8<--
--- gimp/app/preferences_dialog.c.orig Sat Mar 3 03:04:42 2001
+++ gimp/app/prefer
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 08:45:58PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to compile and run the current cvs gimp. I know I have to
> > expect to bug here or there, but I've seen
Hi,
I'm trying to compile and run the current cvs gimp. I know I have to
expect to bug here or there, but I've seen quite a strange thing:
When I run the gimp, it always segfault with this backtrace:
#0 g_on_error_stack_trace (prg_name=0xbb78 "lt-gimp") at gerror.c:176
#1 0x4002a59c
69 matches
Mail list logo
