>>No, Im telling you that for photographic workflows, desire to
>>overwrite is rather rare
this is true,
can be an unrecoverable mistake, even for one unique picture
but sometime overwriting is convenient and desired
Probably the best way is to have this choice in Preferences
Also from an Us
r. Now I've just discovered
there text helpers (Ctrl + E and Shift + Ctrl + E) which indicate the
keyboard shortcuts for mentioned functions ;) - funny.
2011/6/28 peter sikking :
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:35, SorinN wrote:
>
>> But there was already Ctrl + Shift + E whi
But there was already Ctrl + Shift + E which bring up the dialog for export
Ctrl + E was for overwrite without confirm.
Probably the logical order was inverse - many peoples expecting Ctrl +
E to bring up the export dialog,
2011/6/28 Martin Nordholts :
> 2011/6/26 Jeremy Morton :
>> When I open
/6/26 Jason Simanek :
> On 06/26/2011 09:31 AM, SorinN wrote:
>
>> He doesn't know that Ctrl + Shift + E bring to you the Export Dialog
>> where you can choose your different filename AND / OR different
>> extension.
>
> I have to admit, I'm consta
He's right here =>>
"I'm using the export function. Each time I then
press ctrl+E, I'm overwriting that file again and again, without even a
prompt. I don't see a meaningful difference between this workflow, and
that of importing/editing/exporting."
He doesn't know that Ctrl + Shift + E bring
"No it isn't, because unless you go through a lot of extra work to
avoid it, colors in the image that the used CMYK color space is unable
to represent will get lost."
True.
Lot of work in studio then offset hardware will trow out different
things ..because : paper quality, paper type ( coated / u
Jacek - you don't need CMYK for photos ["I need CMYK support for photo
retouch, to create better colors"].
CMYK eventually will kill some nuances - being dependent on the paper
(or other support) color.
RGB colors on screen make use of luminance of the screen pixels - you
can have many nuances of
..sure - better you can use Darktable - is a work in a fast progress -
and has a lot of PRO features - is almost the same like Lightroom from
Adobe
for just basic photographic work Darktable is OK - you can use GIMP
for compositions AFTER you do the your primary color processing in
Darktable.
It's
You should try : http://gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtml
I make a screenshot for you here :
www.anioninternational.com/images/GMIC-for-GIMP.png
OR
you can try LAB Curves for GIMP : http://www.mm-log.com/lab-curves-gimp
Sourceforge here : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mmfilters/files/
2010/8/
probably he compile the a devel version - my previous compilation
reported itself as 2.7.3 but the newest is 2.7.2 ;)
2010/8/11 Jernej Simončič :
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 21:47:08, Dave wrote:
>
>> I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size typically
>> up to about 2
sure - first I told you all some peoples sell GIMP giving impression
of a Pro piece of software ( that mean money - which mean support and
all related things ). Well if you allow this is ok is not my problem.
the second "spam" is about Raw Therapee which move to GPL I was
thinking someone on this
an interesting article about the movement of Raw Therapee to GPL.
http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=1&artid=46
--
Nemes Ioan Sorin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gim
...and seems to be real
check please this link :
http://www.photo-editor-pro.com/
--
Nemes Ioan Sorin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
sure I need the file ..you can send this file attaches at nemes.so...@gmail.com
2009/10/19 Brett :
> I don't know if the developers planned it or decided to take it out. but in
> the earlier dev versions of gimp before the single widow mode XD, when layer
> folders was first introduced their was t
useful.
> Same with automatic foreground extraction methods: For some images
> they save a lot of work, for others they might cause trouble. Some
> people will never use the tools because they want to be in complete
> control of the segmentation process. In sum they are useful though.
&g
Well, every background extraction is tricky - I tried PhotoshopCS 4
tools - they seems to be trivial to use and seem to be easy - but for
a complex task which need a lot of pixel precision you have to do a
lot of manually corrections too so the final feelig is a kind of
frustration - (with gimp mag
. :
> To SorinN: I use Windows (Vista 64 bit and XP) and I only have Gimp 2.6.7 so
> far which is the one that is available for Windows now, if Gimp 2.7 creates a
> single entry in the taskbar and all the Windows minimize when you minimize one
> that's great for me, the multiple window
"I personally, deffinitely prefer the Gimp being a program that always shows
as a single entry in the taskbar that's really my main concern, it's just
easier to manage single entry programs with a multiple applications workflow."
But GIMP 2.7 solve that. Maybe you don't use 2.7. A single entry in
The single big problem with the MDI was when the toolbox and / or
other boxes remain on top of other opened windows when you minimize
the canvas window. Now with GIMP 2.7 things are changed so MDI will
not be such a problem. But indeed a single window app. was a necessary
step. Will be super OK i
I can confirm that
With the previous 2.7 build for windows text tool work ok
2009/8/25 BugByteMan :
> Hello,
>
> Has anybody tried the text tool in Gimp 2.7.0 on windows?
>
> The program crashes with the following error:
>
> Pango:ERROR:pangowin32.c:###:pango_win32_font_finalize: assertion failed
On the main GIMP website they had a statement regarding your concerns :
"The terms of usage and rules about copying are clearly listed in the
GNU General Public License."
And here is the document : http://www.gimp.org/about/COPYING
..so good luck with the book - feel free to ask for here and the
New Layer from Clipboard, New Layer from Screenshoot ( to be explicit and
correct and to be online with the Usability rules ), anyway AS IS NOW is
pretty OK.
2008/9/19 Liam R E Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
>
> > the structure is good: 'New...'
IN RESPONSE to "Photoshop like" idea :
"... it should not look like Photoshop" -> SHOULD NEVER LOOK LIKE Photoshop
- because Photoshop even with the new UI additions on CS3 look horrible -
GUI for *Smurfs*.
I see noone talk here about Corel Draw or Corel Photopaint GUI. For a new
user, from the
That's why we need a Gimp PRO, Inkscape PRO, Scribus PRO - someone, a
Firm / Govern / Foundation / Linux Distro / Billionaire ...or a
mixture of them must hire core developers of all 3 projects - put them
into a big WEB / DTP Core Linux project
and manage development and releases.
This will bring
24 matches
Mail list logo
