On Sunday 06 January 2008 11:52:49 Mark Lowry wrote:
> The reason I asked is that my goal when
> post-processing is to end up with a print that looks
> like my screen.
This is one goal that users should be able to achieve. But I would take it
even farther by saying I want what is on my screen
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 15:15 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
> GIMP aims to be a respectable high-end graphic editor and as such should
> support color management by default. The problem you encountered is the same
> problem many first-time users of Photoshop encounter. Actually, Photoshop
> us
Mark Lowry yahoo.com> writes:
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Shouldn't Try to use be unchecked by default
> at installation? This would prevent some confusion,
> at least it would have for me.
GIMP aims to be a respectable high-end graphic editor and as such should
support color management by de
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:52:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The reason I asked is that my goal when post-processing is to end
up with a print that looks like my screen. When I print from
Windows Picture & Fax Viewer, it looks like what I see on the
screen. I
The reason I asked is that my goal when
post-processing is to end up with a print that looks
like my screen. When I print from Windows Picture &
Fax Viewer, it looks like what I see on the screen. I
assumed that printing from GIMP would give you a print
that looked like the image that is open in
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 05:39 -0800, Mark Lowry wrote:
> 1. Shouldn't Try to use be unchecked by default
> at installation? This would prevent some confusion,
> at least it would have for me.
It is off by default since version 2.4.2. Too many Windows users seem to
have installed monitor
> Mark Lowry skrev:
> > Attached is a link to a screen capture showing the
> > same image opened in Windows Picture and Fax
> viewer
> > and in GIMP 2.4. As you can see, the GIMP version
> (no
> > editing performed) has a haze compared to the WP&F
> > viewer version.
> >
> >
>
http://vabirdy.trip
Mark Lowry skrev:
> Attached is a link to a screen capture showing the
> same image opened in Windows Picture and Fax viewer
> and in GIMP 2.4. As you can see, the GIMP version (no
> editing performed) has a haze compared to the WP&F
> viewer version.
>
> http://vabirdy.tripod.com/images/puppypic
Attached is a link to a screen capture showing the
same image opened in Windows Picture and Fax viewer
and in GIMP 2.4. As you can see, the GIMP version (no
editing performed) has a haze compared to the WP&F
viewer version.
http://vabirdy.tripod.com/images/puppypics/gimp_jpeg_haze.jpg
This is ve
