Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be changed
easily, our users will not any longer know what software they are
using. Contributors will be lost because they will look for the "Foo"
proje
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be
changed easily, our users will not any longer know what so
Hi,
"Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
>> used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so
>> narrow-minded as to having a problem with the na
Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
GNU Image Manipulator
instead of
GNU Image Manipulation Program
?
Of course I would suggest planning and waiting until a major version change to
change it.
_-T
> Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
IMO it is too much of a compromise to even consider a name change.
Discussions like these server only one purpose - artificial creation of a
previously non-existant problem to support the position of the one who
started the disc
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:00:24 -0500
> From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why
The bug report in question was
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160890
I got the name wrong in the message body but it was correct in the message
title.
> > On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >> I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
> >>
Hi Alan,
didn't you say you would stop arguing on this stupid subject?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:26:37 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
>
>
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
> used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so
> narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name.
While I agree with most of what you've said in respons
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan Hor
I shouldn't have suggested compromise of the name.
It would be better to have "Deluxe Edition" as an
optional prefix. DE-GIMP appropriately means to cure
from lameness. We could continue to use the GIMP
name and not lose any name-recognition in the process.
Searches for GIMP would continue to t
> The word itself is inappropriate for software if you're trying
to feed it to the unwashed masses. I said this when GIMP was chosen as
a name back when it moved from Motif to GTK
A correction...
GIMP was called GIMP long before the move from Motif to GTK.
The first public release (0.53 IIRC) was
Some people have difficulty dealing with the connotations of the term "The
GIMP". I wont go into details again about why some people have issues
with the name, some even finding it offensive.
bug 168090 suggests a name change
(and it seems to be the first time anyone has wanted this enough to f
Alan Horkan wrote:
Some people have difficulty dealing with the connotations of the term "The
GIMP". I wont go into details again about why some people have issues
with the name, some even finding it offensive.
I still find it baffling that people would get upset about something
so lighthearted a
Hi Alan,
> I don't think it is a good idea to change the project name.
So you kind of answered to yourself...
> It is a good sign that the gimp has improved so much that people are only
> left with the name to complain about :)
I don't complain about the name.
> I think it would be a fair comp
i have a question for you; you don't need to answer it to anyone but
yourself. what does the word gimp mean to you and where ever could you
have come up with this meaning?
when i hear the word gimp, i get a chuckle from a media image that some
pack of film geniuses inbedded into our collective la
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, David [iso-8859-15] Gómez wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:19:26 +0100
> From: "David [iso-8859-15] Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-de
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:11:39PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> I do not know if you are a native English speaker but the term gimp is has
> a very similar meaning to "cripple". If you look at the bug report I
> point to some comments where people other than me say they have
> encountered diffic
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:51:34 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be con
20 matches
Mail list logo
