Hi everyone,
May I ask someone to give me some feedback about a patch I posted
dealing with bug n° 612931 ?
I probably not understood something ... but I recently checked it
again, and according to me, it does
the trick : allowing the move tool to move individual layer inside a
layer group ( wit
On 03/15/2011 06:38 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>>> Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind
>>> putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the
>>> milestones is supposed to mean. The p
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind
>> putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the
>> milestones is supposed to mean. The prerequisite is in place, making
>> the messages translatab
On 03/15/2011 02:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
>> "months" to within some weeks -
>> I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
>> c
On 03/15/2011 12:35 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Scripts which previously interated through layers are currently not
> working. That is a regression.
It sure sounds like one, please file a bug report and put it on the 2.8
milestone with a scripts that allows the regression to be easily reproduce
On 03/15/2011 10:44 AM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
>> regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
>> languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
> "months" to within some weeks -
> I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
> can update translations as possible, as well. At some reasona
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 11:59 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
>> "months" to within some weeks -
>
> May I ask for the calculations that led you to the conclusion that we
> are
On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
> regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
> languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without layer
> groups support in Python, but the alter
On 03/14/2011 11:59 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
> "months" to within some weeks -
May I ask for the calculations that led you to the conclusion that we
are weeks away from a release? I haven't done the math yet, but I still
FYI, I have code to fix #596410, following the guidelines Martin gave
me, but I don't want to submit that patch until I can actually compile
Gimp again.
Eric
On 03/14/2011 04:22 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As you all know, getting 2.8 out is highest priority right now. There
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
"months" to within some weeks -
I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
can update translations as possible, as well. At some reasonable point
before the release, a "string freeze" status for GIMPshoul
Hi everyone,
As you all know, getting 2.8 out is highest priority right now. There
are however some things that we want to fix before we make a 3.0
release. Thus, we must plan for a 2.10 release.
I have updated our milestones in bugzilla with this. After the update,
there are only 7 bugs on th
13 matches
Mail list logo
