Hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 01:41 -0700, Joe Eagar wrote:
Though I suppose suggesting it on IRC might be more appropriate then on
the list. Is that what you meant?
No, I only meant that filing enhancement requests for this is a waste of
time unless more information can be provided.
Sven
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 20:37 -0500, Daniel Falk wrote:
Photoshop has a tool that works like the healing brush except that it
doesn't require a source region to be specified before using the tool.
When there are a lot of quick touch-ups to do, this is very
Joe Eagar wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 20:37 -0500, Daniel Falk wrote:
Photoshop has a tool that works like the healing brush except that it
doesn't require a source region to be specified before using the tool.
When there are a lot of quick touch-ups to do, this
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi Joe
Suggesting a new feature without specifying how the algorithm behind it
work is pointless because how could the feature then be implemented?
There are way too many other things to use the sparse GIMP developer
resources for than to research details of other
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 09:30 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 20:37 -0500, Daniel Falk wrote:
Photoshop has a tool that works like the healing brush except that it
doesn't require a source region to be specified before using the tool.
When there are a lot of quick
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 19:29 -0500, Daniel Falk wrote:
Since we don't know how this works in detail, there is not much point in
suggesting that we add such a feature.
I could find a video for anyone interested, but that really wasn't my
point. I suggested the feature not simply to
Photoshop has a tool that works like the healing brush except that it
doesn't require a source region to be specified before using the tool.
When there are a lot of quick touch-ups to do, this is very convenient.
Photoshop somehow guesses what it should use as source material and is
often
