Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:40:11 +1000
From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello Robert,
Thank you for the explanation. I can understand the problem of saving
preferences if someone has several instances of an application open. Do
you know what Gimp does?
No I don't. The main probl
"Rebecca J. Walter" wrote:
>
> I don't think I have ever heard of anyone running multiple GIMPs at one
> time. WHY would you need to do this? You do know that you can have any
> number of images open, right?
I do it all the time. I use multiple workspaces, and I usually keep
things together by
> Hello Robert,
> Thank you for the explanation. I can understand the problem of saving
> preferences if someone has several instances of an application open. Do
> you know what Gimp does?
I don't think I have ever heard of anyone running multiple GIMPs at one
time. WHY would you need to do thi
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>
> This sounds a lot like how shared libraries (and indeed, shared text
> in general) work, but it's not enough to solve the problem. If you
> run multiple copies of an application (on most UNIX-like operating
> systems, and even Windows is probably smart enough these da
From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 13:08:21 +1000
- There is the window within window concept. StarOffice and Microsoft
Works both open a window containing multiple windows. I do not like
those instances of windows within windows because they group unrelated
Raphael Quinet wrote:
>
> Yesterday, I wrote:
>
> > Hmmm... Maybe I should re-post this as an article on Advogato?
> >
>
> That's what I did. You can find the article here:
>http://advogato.org/article/287.html
> Some of the replies are interesting, even if they would be a bit
> off-topic
Yesterday, I wrote:
> Hmmm... Maybe I should re-post this as an article on Advogato?
>
That's what I did. You can find the article here:
http://advogato.org/article/287.html
Some of the replies are interesting, even if they would be a bit
off-topic for this list.
-Raphael
___
On 7 Jun 2001, at 10:37, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
> > [... lots of complains deleted]
>
> Your problem is basically that your window manager sucks.
Well, the Window manager sucks, but I believ
Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
> > [... lots of complains deleted]
>
> Your problem is basically that your window manager sucks. If working
> on Unix using a decent window manager, you can
On Thu, 07 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
>> [... lots of complains deleted]
>
> Your problem is basically that your window manager sucks. If working
> on Unix using a decent window manager
Hi,
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
> [... lots of complains deleted]
Your problem is basically that your window manager sucks. If working
on Unix using a decent window manager, you can use a separate virtual
desktop for Gimp
Peter wrote:
>
> Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
It simply reloads the previous configuration on Linux. But I don't know
about the Windows version.
> That way, when I am in GIMP, the whole screen is working the Gimp way,
> and when I am in Word, the whole scree
Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
All the talk about user interfaces made me think about what annoys me
most. using the desktop analogy, normal Windows applications look like
an organized desktop and Gimp/Apple style applications look like a messy
desktop. I do not
13 matches
Mail list logo
