On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 16:43 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Liam R E Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > My own feeling is that it would be better to wait until there is
> > some experience with the post-2.4 GIMP and higher definition
> > colour models before changing any of the colo
On 8/18/07, Liam R E Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:50 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
>
> > If somebody is interested in participating in this process please send
> > me an e-mail so we can coordinate efforts with Danko and Marius
>
> My own feeling is that it would b
Liam wrote:
> My own feeling is that it would be better to wait until there is
> some experience with the post-2.4 GIMP and higher definition
> colour models before changing any of the colour tools.
Our intention is to describe a usage scenario and brainstorm a possible
interface for the tool, as
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:50 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> If somebody is interested in participating in this process please send
> me an e-mail so we can coordinate efforts with Danko and Marius
My own feeling is that it would be better to wait until there is
some experience with the post-
My previous message replied by Danko was intended to be off-list to
avoid the noise and personal opinions, but somehow it ended here, so I'd
like to clarify.
When I say that one must "convince" developers I mean by providing
strong arguments in favor of the proposed solution/feature.
Not just re
Hi Sven!
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:41 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
>
>
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that mockup basically aims to
>> change the aspect of the dialog without adding any enhancement. The
>> tool does exactly the same but the dialog look
Hi Guillermo!
>Hi Danko:
>Here is a very very early mockup.
>I have the idea but had no time to translate it to a better mockup.
I know - t's the same for me too... ;-)
>I have to re-arrange some buttons, add others, and think lots of
things (for example, I'm not sure if >the current widgets a
Hi Guillermo!
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
>
> Danko Dolch escribió:
>>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that mockup basically aims to
>>> change the aspect of the dialog without adding any enhancement. The
>>> tool does exactly the same but the dialog looks like Photoshop's one.
>> Does it?
Hi Guillermo!
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> Marius B wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that nobody is interested in this enhancement, but IMO it`s a
>> nice feature that is worth discussing.
>> I would like to hear your opinion about my mockup of this dialog
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attac
Hi Sven!
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:41 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
>
>
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that mockup basically aims to
>> change the aspect of the dialog without adding any enhancement. The
>> tool does exactly the same but the dialog look
Hi Guillermo!
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> Marius B wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that nobody is interested in this enhancement, but IMO it`s a
>> nice feature that is worth discussing.
>> I would like to hear your opinion about my mockup of this dialog
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.c
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:41 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that mockup basically aims to change
> the aspect of the dialog without adding any enhancement. The tool does
> exactly the same but the dialog looks like Photoshop's one.
> The only improvem
Marius B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that nobody is interested in this enhancement, but IMO it`s a
> nice feature that is worth discussing.
> I would like to hear your opinion about my mockup of this dialog
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=92732
> in bugreport
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Marius B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that nobody is interested in this enhancement, but IMO it`s a
> nice feature that is worth discussing.
> I would like to hear your opinion about my mockup of this dialog
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=92732
> in bugreport
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Hi Marius!
I think there are people interested in this enhancement, but it depends
on how it is prepared and presented.
Currently all dev. stuff is working hardly on 2.4 release so they are a
bit busy. ;-)
It's usual to write a C patch and try to get it accepted by the dev. here.
Ok currently I
Hi,
It seems that nobody is interested in this enhancement, but IMO it`s a
nice feature that is worth discussing.
I would like to hear your opinion about my mockup of this dialog
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=92732
in bugreport
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461658
I know
Hello,
Yesterday I filled a bugreport 461658 about this, but I was advised,
better to discus this matter here. There I have attached the patch and
a mockup.
Currently, hue-saturation tool dialog has master button surrounded with 6 color
boxes, whitch changes its color while regulating hue/lightn
17 matches
Mail list logo
