Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-20 Thread Rebecca J. Walter
> Bex is only working at the core right now. Your patch is already applied > in my tree so it will certainly find its way into HEAD. I wouldn't mind > if you commit it yourself however. Bex is slow right now because she is fighting an ucky cold or something. Other people also paying attention

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just noticed that same cut'n'paste error is in gimp HEAD branch. But it > is reported that Rebecca is reviewing gimp head. Should any such i18n > patch directed to her? Bex is only working at the core right now. Your patch is already applied i

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-19 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote: > Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If the change is correct, it should of course go into 1.2 since it's > > a bugfix then. > > Yes, bugfixes should go in. Cosmetical things should not go in; instead > of fixing a typ

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Open up the gimpressionist dialog, choose the "size" tab and see the > tooltip of the first slide. You'll know that I'm not adjusting it for > my personal taste if you did see my patch. OK, it's obviously a cut'n'paste bug. I'll apply your patc

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-17 Thread degger
On 17 Nov, Sven Neumann wrote: > If the change is correct, it should of course go into 1.2 since it's > a bugfix then. "Correct" is relative when it comes to messages. Typoes are for sure not correct though a different wording is more or less a matter of personal taste. > I do give a shit and

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-17 Thread Karl Eichwalder
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the change is correct, it should of course go into 1.2 since it's > a bugfix then. Yes, bugfixes should go in. Cosmetical things should not go in; instead of fixing a typo, say, you should provide an "overload" in en.po resp. en_{GB,US}.po. It isn'

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On 15 Nov, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > > A tooltip talking about brush sizes in gimpressionist was mentioning > > "direction" instead. Is the attached diff OK to commit? Wanna confirm, > > since gimp 1.2.3 releasing date should be close(?). > > Not sure someon

Re: [Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-17 Thread degger
On 15 Nov, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > A tooltip talking about brush sizes in gimpressionist was mentioning > "direction" instead. Is the attached diff OK to commit? Wanna confirm, > since gimp 1.2.3 releasing date should be close(?). Not sure someone answered this mail yet. With 1.2.x we're i

[Gimp-developer] One wrong string in gimp-1-2 branch

2001-11-14 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Hi, A tooltip talking about brush sizes in gimpressionist was mentioning "direction" instead. Is the attached diff OK to commit? Wanna confirm, since gimp 1.2.3 releasing date should be close(?). Abel --- /home/maddog/size.c Wed Aug 30 16:20:24 2000 +++ ./size.cThu Nov 15 05:47:21