Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-03 Thread David Necas (Yeti)
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:07:34AM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 02:15:42 +0200 > > Excuse me, but which reentrancy problem has been eliminated? > > Does it mean the render function no longer needs to be > > reentrant? > > Yes, just added some book-keeping to preview, and it seem

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Nathan Carl Summers
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ernst Lippe wrote: > On the contrary, there appear to be lots of acceptable > names. > I am suprised that nobody has suggested YetAnotherGimpPreview :) How about GimpPluginView? GimpSample? GimpTheWidgetFormerlyKnownAsPreview? GimpFancyPreview? GimpMcPreview? GimpExample? Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 02:15:42 +0200 "David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote: > > P.S. I just modified my preview so that the re-entrancy problem has > > been eliminated. > > Excuse me, but which reentrancy problem has been elimi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread David Necas (Yeti)
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote: > P.S. I just modified my preview so that the re-entrancy problem has > been eliminated. Excuse me, but which reentrancy problem has been eliminated? Does it mean the render function no longer needs to be reentrant? Regards, Yeti P.S

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
Even though I fully agree that the only serious problem in my API proposal is the name of the widget, I'd really like to get more input from more people about my API proposal. Especially, I would like to hear remarks from other plug-in developers, because they are after all the intended audience f

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:30:04 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >anyway. Now if only we could come up with a good name for the core > >widget ... > > May I suggest "GimpMiniview"? Yes, you may :) But it sounds like something tiny. Actually when you z

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread gimp-devel
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2 Apr 2003: > May I suggest "GimpMiniview"? GimpMiniMe would be shorter, and probably more in the gimp tradition. A filter just as diabolical but at 1/8th the size! Michael ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread usr352
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >anyway. Now if only we could come up with a good name for the core >widget ... May I suggest "GimpMiniview"? -- Pedro Gimeno ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/ma

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-01 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:54:18 +0200 "David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about something like GimpProofView? > - it't not longer than GimpThumbnail > - it resembles GimpPreview > - "proof" is a relatively good word (though mostly used > in printing only, in this sense) > - the "

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-01 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:59:21 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The only way to avoid this overhead is to make interface more > > complicated, analogous to the GimpPixelRegions, there should > > be an _init interface that the pre

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only way to avoid this overhead is to make interface more > complicated, analogous to the GimpPixelRegions, there should > be an _init interface that the preview uses to inform the plug-in > about the total area that it wants, and a _render_tile i

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Irony is always difficult on a written medium like e-mail. > (I should have included some smileys) > Of course, I know that this was not a very realistic option, > but perhaps it might trigger the core developers to think > about a good name for this

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-01 Thread David Necas (Yeti)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:11:36PM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:21:06 -0800 (PST) > Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (off-the-cuff) Perhaps GimpThumbnail? > > It is a nice short name, but I have the impression that a thumbnail > is a reduced size version

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:50:00 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > P.S. Of course the most logical solution is to change the name of > > the core widget. My widget is derived from Shawn Amundson's GimpPreview > > widget that was wri

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S. Of course the most logical solution is to change the name of > the core widget. My widget is derived from Shawn Amundson's GimpPreview > widget that was written in 1998, and that was long before some > GIMP developer tried to claim that name. It

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:17:51 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As promised here is my API proposal for a plug-in preview widget. > > You can find it at http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview. > > In the section "Design" in "Ca

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:21:06 -0800 (PST) Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31 Mar 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > > I'd even prefer to have everything that is related to this widget be > > under the same namespace. Unfortunately GimpPreview is already taken, so > > we either ne

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:58:29 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As promised here is my API proposal for a plug-in preview widget. > > You can find it at http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview. > > > > Please examine it critical

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As promised here is my API proposal for a plug-in preview widget. > You can find it at http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview. In the section "Design" in "Calling the render function" you state: A somewhat smarter version of this preview used a di

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Nathan Carl Summers
On 31 Mar 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > I'd even prefer to have everything that is related to this widget be > under the same namespace. Unfortunately GimpPreview is already taken, so > we either need to change the name of the core object or find a new one > for the plug-in preview. (off-the-cuff)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As promised here is my API proposal for a plug-in preview widget. > You can find it at http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview. > > Please examine it critically, this should be a preview that > should be usable for a very wide range of plug-ins. > >

[Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-03-31 Thread Ernst Lippe
As promised here is my API proposal for a plug-in preview widget. You can find it at http://refocus.sourceforge.net/preview. Please examine it critically, this should be a preview that should be usable for a very wide range of plug-ins. Because I would like to reuse this proposal (or what is lef