On 09/07/2009 07:49 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> Thanks all, for the confirmation and clarification.
For reference, here is the gimp-developer thread leading up to the
rearrangements:
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2008-November/thread.html#21099
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:47, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
>> Moin!
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishen wrote:
>> > I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
>> > gimpusers.com - "Layer modes have been
Thanks all, for the confirmation and clarification.
-Rob A>
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
>> Moin!
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishen wrote:
>> > I read that the layer modes are being grouped diffe
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
> Moin!
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
> > gimpusers.com - "Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
> > use. For example, all mode
Moin!
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
> gimpusers.com - "Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
> use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
> arranged together now.")
As
I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
gimpusers.com - "Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
arranged together now.")
Is this just a UI change, or is the enum value changed as well?
Specif
