On 2002-12-06 at 1320.24 -0800, Nathan Carl Summers typed this:
> On 6 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > well, using AUTHORS is probably a bad idea since it is the ASCII-only
> > version generated from the file contributors which also has UTF8
> > encoded names.
>
> Actually, it reads contributors
On 2002-12-06 at 1516.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On 06 Dec 2002 14:54:37 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pleas excuse me if I missed something but IIRC I'm even subscribed to
> > the gimp-web list and in the last months I haven't heard anything
> > about the stuff you
On 2002-12-06 at 1454.37 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
> well, using AUTHORS is probably a bad idea since it is the ASCII-only
> version generated from the file contributors which also has UTF8
> encoded names. I'd really like to replace this mess by something saner
> and I was hoping that
On 2002-12-06 at 1454.37 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> pleas excuse me if I missed something but IIRC I'm even subscribed to
> the gimp-web list and in the last months I haven't heard anything
> about the stuff you are talking about. There has been rumours about
> work being done on th
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:55:00 -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002-12-05 at 1759.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:20:28 -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i am worried that if you make it too hard of a job, you will scare away
> > >
Hi Carol,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the AUTHORS list gets copied as is to a page now. i have no idea how
> the information gets there. i like the alphabetical listing also.
>
> the ChangeLog is a completely different matter. chronological and lists
> what is going on, without
On 2002-12-05 at 1759.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:20:28 -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2002-12-05 at 1320.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> > > On 05 Dec 2002 12:42:28 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > However I don't
