Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 21:01 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > Well. I compiled it with --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes, > > and it works fine. It seems slightly faster on some operations (Although > > I could easily be imagining that), but sadly still doesn't resolve my issue > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Jon Senior wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:13 +0400 > "Alexandre Prokoudine" wrote: > > Color management isn't fully implemented yet (previews will give you > > wrong colors in plug-ins if you use AdobeRGB as working space profile, > > too). No idea when this

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Jon Senior
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:13 +0400 "Alexandre Prokoudine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Color management isn't fully implemented yet (previews will give you > wrong colors in plug-ins if you use AdobeRGB as working space profile, > too). No idea when this will be fixed. To be honest, aside from the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Jon Senior wrote: > Well. I compiled it with --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes, > and it works fine. It seems slightly faster on some operations (Although > I could easily be imagining that), but sadly still doesn't resolve my issue > of the CMYK values in th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Jon Senior
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:01:45 + xsdg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well. I compiled it with --enable-shared=no --enable-static=yes, and it works fine. It seems slightly faster on some operations (Although I could easily be imagining that), but sadly still doesn't resolve my issue of the CMYK val

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-28 Thread Jon Senior
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:01:45 + xsdg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you make sure to `export LD_LIBRARY_PATH`? (I'm not sure what the > equivalent might be for different shells). This is likely the problem > if you see a difference between the output of Yup. The wrapper script does that,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-27 Thread xsdg
Jon Senior wrote: > Sorry if this is the wrong list for this question, but I figure the > developers are most likely to be doing this. > > I've followed the instructions on the site. BABL, GEGL and Gimp are all > installed to /usr/local/gimp2.5. I've installed a modified version of the > sugges

[Gimp-developer] Running Gimp 2.4.x and 2.5.0 side by side

2008-04-27 Thread Jon Senior
Sorry if this is the wrong list for this question, but I figure the developers are most likely to be doing this. I've followed the instructions on the site. BABL, GEGL and Gimp are all installed to /usr/local/gimp2.5. I've installed a modified version of the suggested wrapper script (with the c