A clear distinction between Save and Export was needed
But even if conceptually different in practice , both operation are always
needed for the every edited image:
is needed to Save the original AND to export as jpg or png .
So why do not offer a chance to speed up the workflow, save time and
I send the mock up to the gimp-Ui brainstorm.
And for end users that may be interested ,in the while RobA cooked a script
that offer basically equivalent features
obviously can't offer same GUI of my mock up, but allow
1 ) to Save+Export , popping out a error message if the image was not alrea
i knew that Peter Sikking (or somebody else from Gimp UI brainstorm
staff)replied but the message get lost for technical problems (full storage
disk)
I am very interested to know the content of that reply,i hope you may send
again now
--
photocomix (via www.gimpusers.com)
__
probably this will be my last reply on the matter, i do not like insist
proposing something that someone else has to code, even if in this case
would be just a trigger for not interactive call(s)
I divided the objection in 2 groups, the first group focused on possible
disadvantages and technica
An idea (especially for when GIMP moves to GEGL). Apologies if this
has been suggested/shot down before.
I think that the following terminology would be fairly clear to users:
Save IMAGE (basically, export to a non-xcf format)
Save PROJECT (save the xcf/gegl tree)
Save WORKSPACE (save th
photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> As you may see the idea is not to replace the Export dialog, but to offer a
> handy option from the Save dialog, to simultaneously export , with same name
> and in the same directory in other file formats
Wouldn't this be fairly straightforward to do a
Hi,
On 10/05/2009 02:10 AM, photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
> But even if conceptually different in practice , both operation are always
> needed for the every edited image:
> is needed to Save the original AND to export as jpg or png .
This assumption is wrong. Complex compositions will need to be
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/05/2009 02:10 AM, photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
> > But even if conceptually different in practice , both operation are always
> > needed for the every edited image:
> > is needed to Save the original AND to export as jpg o
photocomix wrote:
> i knew that Peter Sikking (or somebody else from Gimp UI brainstorm
> staff)replied but the message get lost for technical problems (full
> storage
> disk)
yes, I am (by default) the Gimp UI brainstorm staff, and I had about
3 threads going on here before the list collapsed.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM, peter sikking wrote:
> so that is why I am against this.
>
> --ps
Even that said, anyone is free to develop a save and export plugin and
offer it up for public consumption. It may not make it into the core,
but assuming it is worthwhile, it will find use.
[Looks like every time I post, I kill the list. My apologies; reposting]
On 2009-10-05, photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
> So why do not offer a chance to speed up the workflow, save time and
> patience
> achieving both result simultaneusly ?
>
> A image is worth 1.000 words ,to avoid misunderstu
11 matches
Mail list logo
