Please forgive me forwarded wrong message(carol's) by mistake previously.
-- Forwarded message --
From: miriam clinton (iriXx) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:48:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...
To: L
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:44:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...
To: "miriam clinton (iriXx)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GIMPDev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
-- Forwarded message --
From: Laxminarayan Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:23:11 +0530
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
some day, someone write:
>
> I would say it would take
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:41PM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
hi, i am really glad that you stuck with this list. since making this
excellent decision, might i direct you to this document:
http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html and ask that you at least strip the
mail
Carol Spears wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:05AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:17:20AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
professional graphic designer,
Carol Spears wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:05AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
I'm freelance, have worked for a variety of companies in temporary
contracts or purely freelance (I value my independence, and owning my
own company).
I would say it would take me at least dou
Sven Neumann wrote:
Yes, the plan's to move the scripts out of the script-fu menu into the
places they belong to. What's missing here though is a better menu
registration functionality in Script-Fu. Kevin wanted to add a bug
report about this.
Actually, I was originally expecting Sven to add the bu
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:05AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:17:20AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
> >>professional graphic designer, considerin
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
"miriam clinton (iriXx)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Script-Fu is totally incomprehensible to graphic designers
Actually you are not supposed to recognize that it's a script-fu. How
to achieve that is what we are discussing at the moment.
Sven
Brilliant!
I was
Hmm, will give it a try. Again, not easy to find - designers also work
under a great deal of pressure to get stuff done fast, and a tool where
selections appear obscured will not encourage them so easily. Cinepaint,
though, has had a great deal of success. I'm going to be interested to
compile
Jakub Friedl (lists) wrote:
please use Win 98 or XP if you have to use Windows, but not ME. It is
the worst system from Microsoft available.
I'm testing on both Win ME (forced to by a proprietary laptop) and XP.
XP has a nice widget set. But a designer - a vanilla designer, not a
programmer-d
]> ]> The natural place for a user to look would be
]> ]> within the "brushes" dialog.
]> ]Huh? ...? Seriously?
]> Seriously:
]> That's where brushes ...
]> Brush editor is the only other tool that creates brushes.
]That isn't true. Image->Save ...
I stand corrected. Brush editor is the only
Hi,
"miriam clinton (iriXx)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Script-Fu is totally incomprehensible to graphic designers
Actually you are not supposed to recognize that it's a script-fu. How
to achieve that is what we are discussing at the moment.
Sven
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I meant as an export operation. In general, if you pass a file to
> a save operation that it doesn't support, it proposes an export
> operation to convert to a format supported (like saving an RGB
> image as gif, for example). I'm not sure how that's
Hi,
Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, David Neary wrote:
> > Alan Horkan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, David Neary wrote:
> > > > It should also (IMHO) work on images and not just drawables,
> > > > proposing a flatten if necessary. Every time I have used
> > > > selection to brush so
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Seriously:
That's where brushes are managed.
That's where they're deleted.
That's where they're chosen.
That's where they're created from scratch.
That's where they're edited.
That's where someone looking for a brush that doesn
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:17:20AM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
> professional graphic designer, considering the mainstream
> Adobe/Macromedia market who would have never used GIMP, and how we can
> 'convert them over'
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, David Neary wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:36:18 +0100
> From: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in
> me
Miriam
> okay... since i'm in the Hotel California where you can check in but
> never check out
Sorry that the you were unable to unsubscribe, I have no idea why the
unsubscribe system didn't work for you but I'm pretty sure the developers
were joking and that if you are still unable to uns
; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in
> menus...
>
> just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
> professional graphic designer, considering the mainstream
> Adobe/Macromedia market who woul
Hi,
Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, David Neary wrote:
> > It should also (IMHO) work on images and not just drawables,
> > proposing a flatten if necessary. Every time I have used
> > selection to brush so far, the selection was created with "select
> > all".
>
> I'd rather not add a f
> Also - anyone have an address for the Inkscape-devel and Sodipodi-devel
> lists?
http://www.inkscape.org/mailing_lists.php
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sodipodi-list
here you are
> candy' - thats another important factor for designers, we're competing
> with the Windows and Mac
just to clarify - i'm here contributing from the point of view of a
professional graphic designer, considering the mainstream
Adobe/Macromedia market who would have never used GIMP, and how we can
'convert them over' . This market are of
the 'pick it up and use it' intuitive designers - they wi
> Script-Fu is totally incomprehensible to graphic designers
>
it depends. i am a fluent script-fu speaker for example.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
okay... since i'm in the Hotel California where you can check in but
never check out
from a graphic designer's point of view this is a nightmare... most of
them wouldnt know how to use the Bash shell, or only the basics, let
alone how to do this.
Is it possible to design a GUI implementati
gt; Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in
> menus...
>
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Script-Fu->Selection->To Brush solves this nicely
> > but it should be moved to a better place in the menus.
I forgot that I made further modif
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Script-Fu->Selection->To Brush solves this nicely
> but it should be moved to a better place in the menus.
It should also (IMHO) work on images and not just drawables,
proposing a flatten if necessary. Every time I have used
selection to brush so far, the selection was c
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The natural place for a user to look would be
> > within the "brushes" dialog.
>
> Huh? If you wanted to use the current image or part of it as a brush,
> you would look in the Brushes dialog? Seriously?
Personally I'
Hi,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ]> The natural place for a user to look would be
> ]> within the "brushes" dialog.
> ]
> ]Huh? If you wanted to use the current image or part of it as a brush,
> ]you would look in the Brushes dialog? Seriously?
> ]
>
> Seriously:
>
> That's
]> The natural place for a user to look would be
]> within the "brushes" dialog.
]
]Huh? If you wanted to use the current image or part of it as a brush,
]you would look in the Brushes dialog? Seriously?
]
Seriously:
That's where brushes are managed.
That's where they're deleted.
That's where t
Hi,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The natural place for a user to look would be
> within the "brushes" dialog.
Huh? If you wanted to use the current image or part of it as a brush,
you would look in the Brushes dialog? Seriously?
Sven
__
]> Select->To...->[Brush/Channel/Image/Path/Pattern/...]
]
]I agree that it would help if the scripts
]were moved to elsewhere in the
]menus, but I reiterate my point that I do
]not think they do not belong ]in
]the Select menu.
]
The natural place for a user to look would be
within the "brushe
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Popolon wrote:
> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:00:35 +0100
> From: Popolon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...
>
> Actually in Select menu there is two items "To Path&
Hi,
Popolon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The menu Select could have an organisation for these conversions as:
>
> Select->To...->[Brush/Channel/Image/Path/Pattern/...]
>
> to avoid a to long Select menu.
>
> and a 'Selection To Brush/Pattern' button could be in brush/Pattern
> windows, as there
Actually in Select menu there is two items "To Path" and "Save To Channel".
I searched long time how to convert selection to brush, I think that the
only way was to save brush to a file, move the file to ~/.gimp-xx/brush
folder and restart gimp.
This week in a newsgroup, another guy searched did
35 matches
Mail list logo
