Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Kevin, On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 11:42 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: I tried using the Script-Fu scripts and immediately ran in to a minor problem. SIOD uses 'the-environment' where TinyScheme uses 'current-environment'. I ran into this problem as well. On one of my machines, the script

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-16 Thread Kevin Cozens
Sven Neumann wrote: On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 11:42 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: I tried using the Script-Fu scripts and immediately ran in to a minor problem. SIOD uses 'the-environment' where TinyScheme uses 'current-environment'. Is there some way we can work around this? It would be nice if

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Kevin, On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 11:42 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: My source tree of CVS GIMP now contains a Tiny-Fu'd version of Script-Fu. The changes are available as patch files ready to be reviewed. I am now waiting on a final ok before the changes will be commited to CVS. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-15 Thread mobin joseph
please take me out of the mailing list thank you. From:Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.eduTo:gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDUSubject:Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?Date:Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:08:38 +0200On Fri

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/15/06, mobin joseph wrote: please take me out of the mailing list thank you. Since noone took you here, why should someone take you out of here? Bottom line of every email in this list is: https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer Please go there and remove

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-13 Thread Kevin Cozens
Sven Neumann wrote: Fine with me. But I was assuming that the scripts are identical anyway. If you prefer to use the ones in Tiny-Fu, you will have to make sure that you incorporate the recent changes, in particular the blurb review. I tried using the Script-Fu scripts and immediately ran in

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-13 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:42:25 -0400, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My source tree of CVS GIMP now contains a Tiny-Fu'd version of Script-Fu. The changes are available as patch files ready to be reviewed. I am now waiting on a final ok before the changes will be commited to CVS. Consider

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-13 Thread Kevin Cozens
Raphaël Quinet wrote: Anybody who tries to apply these patches would be well advised to pay close attention to the README file first. I had updated the README file and the scripts.patch file last night but had not uploaded the new versions to the web site. The new files have now been

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 19:55 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: You suggested moving Script-Fu (and pygimp) in to a module outside of the GIMP source tree in 2004. Well, that was two years ago and lots of people have expressed their opinion that splitting up the gimp tree into stand-alone

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-09 Thread Kevin Cozens
Sven Neumann wrote: First of all, I would like to hear Kevin on this. I have asked him to tell us about his goals for Tiny-Fu and in order to evaluate this question, we absolutely need to know what the goals are. My goals re: Tiny-Fu have never changed. See my reply to the devel docs thread.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:10 -0700, Saul Goode wrote: Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu explicitely, but otherwise

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-06 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:15:58 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:10 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: From my point of view, Tiny-Fu is now ready to replace Script-Fu and I would like to encourage everybody to make the switch so that we can fix any remaining

[Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-05 Thread Raphaël Quinet
Since last week, Tiny-Fu is able to run many of the old Script-Fu scripts unmodified: it reads files with the *.scm extension and uses the script-fu-* namespace so that it can process the calls to script-fu-register. I tested Tiny-Fu with several third-party scripts or scripts that are not in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:10 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: From my point of view, Tiny-Fu is now ready to replace Script-Fu and I would like to encourage everybody to make the switch so that we can fix any remaining bugs. Considering that Tiny-Fu solves some real problems (i18n), the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-05 Thread Saul Goode
Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu explicitely, but otherwise Script-Fu should be considered as obsolete. I should like to