This is something that has been bothering me for a while, and maybe I am
not the only one who has noticed this. I have compiled the CVS HEAD
version and the 1.2.3 version on the same old machine (a Pentium 200)
and the CVS version is significantly slower than the 1.2.x version. Of
course, there
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is something that has been bothering me for a while, and maybe I am
> not the only one who has noticed this. I have compiled the CVS HEAD
> version and the 1.2.3 version on the same old machine (a Pentium 200)
> and the CVS version is signif
On 24 Apr 2002 15:26:05 +0200, "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does anybody know what could be the source of these delays? Is this due
> > to the GIMP itself (debugging code, new user interface) or is this due to
> > the fact that the CVS
Hi,
RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I have played with testgtk in both versions. Unfortunately the
> interface has changed so it is hard to compare the performance in both
> cases. The new one from GTK+ 2.0 is definitely slower, but it is
> difficult to say if that would expl
