[Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

2003-08-19 Thread Daniel Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone else noticed how the [EMAIL PROTECTED] spam is getting a little out of hand? perhaps now would be a good time to change that address. - -- Dan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla

Re: [Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

2003-08-19 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Daniel Rogers wrote: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:00:55 -0700 From: Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Gimp-developer] [EMAIL PROTECTED] spam getting a little out of hand -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone else noticed

Re: [Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

2003-08-19 Thread pcg
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:58:25PM +0100, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Banning attachments and HTML email might be a tolerable compromise. A compromise that wouldn't even catch 1% of the mail isn't torable in my opinion (especially as it's not possible to filter for this). How can one

Re: [Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

2003-08-19 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:20:43PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:04, Rapha??l Quinet wrote: We cannot easily change that address because that would require changing all gimp bugs, which are using this as the contact address. But as I suggested during GIMPcon,

Re: [Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

2003-08-19 Thread pcg
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:02:18PM -0700, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Done. Damn, you were too fast :) Thanks for implementing it! -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __