Hi Alan,
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
and as I already said before, using the 2.0 version of gfig would mean
to at least port the old version to the HIG standards,
I was suggesting shipping the old unmodified version because it was more
stable.
I just
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:42:42 +0100
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'Useless
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:41:18 +0100
From: Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
Hi all.
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was unable to get to use the gimp 2.1 series until recently. I
cannot provide feedback only when it suits your timetable. When I
pointed out problems with 2.0 you gave out to me for not mentioning
them during the 1.3 cycle so I am making my
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:03:28PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote:
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My counterpoint is that even though a submenu means only one extra
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:51:26PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
(I really hope Gfig will be rolled back as the developer working on it has
previously suggested, it is definately not ready for 2.2)
Thanks for your help. AFAIK, I'm the only one really working on gfig
for now. It isn't ready
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:39:58 +0100
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can
I'm surprised that enough users would be changing the setting often enough
to want to be able to set it on a once off per window basis, I would have
though that a single global preference would to override the toolkit
default would have been enough
oh please no. or is the gimp supposed to be
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jakub Friedl (lists) wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:57:51 +0100
From: Jakub Friedl (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
GDev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
I'm surprised that enough users would
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given my previous comments that is understandable and I think
discoverability is important but it doesn't make sense to have a seperate
menu item for every obscure feature and to me this is most definately an
obscure feature.
It has been requested
Hi all.
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given my previous comments that is understandable and I think
discoverability is important but it doesn't make sense to have a
seperate menu item for every
-- Forwarded message --
From: Laxminarayan Kamath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:34:51 +0530
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
To: David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100, David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes
12 matches
Mail list logo
