Hi,
Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This meta tarball would not be very hard to create or maintain: it's
> just that the version numbers would have to be increased from time to
> time, whenever the contents of a new gimp/gimp-gap/gimp-perl/... tarball
> are extracted and included in
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:06:12 +0200, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If everything ended up in one tarball, with a single-step build,
> > > that would be grand. But I don't believe that's the intention,
> > > given the pre
