ok, a 100% legal copy from a correct dealer is about 60,- euro.
Michael Schumacher schrieb:
Bart wrote:
A PS6 version at ebay is about 40,- euro (new)
It would be difficult to find one that isn't just a pirated copy, though :)
HTH,
Michael
P.S. Please reply below the quoted text.
--
Ok, maybe not using ebay buy a legal PS6 (i renembered that where a lot
of PS6 clones called OEM but there was never a PS6 OEM version) but i'm
sure i know somebody have a 100% legal version of photoshop and sponsor
it to the gimp development.
Michael Schumacher schrieb:
Bart wrote:
A PS6
Bart wrote:
> A PS6 version at ebay is about 40,- euro (new)
It would be difficult to find one that isn't just a pirated copy, though :)
HTH,
Michael
P.S. Please reply below the quoted text.
--
The GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org
Mhm, good point, seems you are right. So the legal way could be bying a
legal 2nd hand version of PS6 for the developer that develops the PSD
support.
A PS6 version at ebay is about 40,- euro (new) so if there would be a
active gimp developer that would do that no problem sponsor this package
Bart writes:
> BTW the SDK is available on other sites on the net i posted the url at
> the beginning of that thread.
Surely you aren't suggesting that we should use illegally (well,
against its license anyway) redistributed copies of the PS6 SDK to
improve the psd plug-in? That would be very u
Reaching PS6 compatibility would such a great goal. I know a lot of
creatives using just PS6 or 7 and i can't renember that any of them has
problems about reading files of newer version like CS1 or CS2.
My self getting a legal version of PS6 at work and didn't get any
problems neither.
A sta
On Friday 03 March 2006 22:41, Florent Monnier wrote:
> > > > It is somewhat futile to point out that support for the PSD format
> > > > needs to be improved. We know that. We know that for several years
> > > > now. We simply need someone who invests the time to improve it. No
> > > > need to conv
> > > It is somewhat futile to point out that support for the PSD format
> > > needs to be improved. We know that. We know that for several years
> > > now. We simply need someone who invests the time to improve it. No
> > > need to convince anyone that it is a good idea.
> >
> > rather than doing
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Florent Monnier wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:27:30 +0100
> From: Florent Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: [Gimp-developer] support for the PSD
>
> > It is somewhat futile to point out that
> It is somewhat futile to point out that support for the PSD format
> needs to be improved. We know that. We know that for several years
> now. We simply need someone who invests the time to improve it. No
> need to convince anyone that it is a good idea.
rather than doing this job in the gimp, w
10 matches
Mail list logo
