Hi Sven,
On Saturday 19 July 2003 7:48 am,
I'm working on it; I've got 1.3.16 installed and working, and it doesn't
look as though the relevant code has changed too much (just been moved a
bit).
It would be really nice to get a patch against 1.3.16.
A patch against 1.3.16 is now
Hi,
Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know those slashdot trolls..
Yes I know those slashdot trolls. They troll and flame whatever you
do. So what is your point in mentioning them? Do you believe they
would not troll about 1.4? I stronly doubt that.
What is really hurting GIMP
On 19-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
We might do another 1.2 release but I doubt that this will happen and
it would surely be just be a bug-fix release with no new feature
whatsoever. GIMP-1.3 is close to being released as 2.0 and support for
1.2 will be dropped then.
Releasing the stable from
On 19 July, 2003 - Patrick McFarland sent me these 1,1K bytes:
On 19-Jul-2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
We might do another 1.2 release but I doubt that this will happen and
it would surely be just be a bug-fix release with no new feature
whatsoever. GIMP-1.3 is close to being released as 2.0
Conceptually I like this, and the gotchas are toggleable
via the UI.
I like the idea too. It should be checked in and turned on by default.
Austin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried the patch. It worked just fine, and IMHO should be used
as a fix to the aforementioned bug.
I tried to aply adptive supersampling with maximum depth,
to compare the effects with the ones from the patch: I had to kill out
gimp after 20 minutes of 90% CPU use and no response.
Austin
Hi,
Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Conceptually I like this, and the gotchas are toggleable
via the UI.
I like the idea too. It should be checked in and turned on by default.
The patch is against 1.2.5 so we cannot check it in. But we should do
if we got a patch against current
Hi Sven,
On Friday 18 July 2003 8:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The patch is against 1.2.5 so we cannot check it in. But we should do
if we got a patch against current CVS or 1.3.16 attached to the
bug-report.
I'm working on it; I've got 1.3.16 installed and working, and it doesn't look
Hi,
Alastair Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm working on it; I've got 1.3.16 installed and working, and it doesn't look
as though the relevant code has changed too much (just been moved a bit).
It would be really nice to get a patch against 1.3.16.
BTW - are there likely to be any
Sven Neumann wrote:
Alastair Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've created a little patch against GIMP 1.2.5 to allow dithering of
gradients, which significantly improves their appearance when printed.
If you're interested, you can find out more here:
10 matches
Mail list logo
