On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. libtool should make sure that the libraries are found anyway (unless
moved). ld.so.cache is only that, a cache
Well, then gimp.m4 does the wrong thing, since after I install a new
version of the
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to note that the suggestion of Raphael is based on
assumptions that were either never true, or were true many months ago.
Before all of you second his suggestions I would really appreciate it if
people looked at the
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. libtool should make sure that the libraries are found anyway (unless
moved). ld.so.cache is only that, a cache
Well, then gimp.m4
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 21:44:49 +0100
From: Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 07:23:49AM -0500, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the presence of the Gimp. It's considerably more than "just a cache";
it controls how runtime dynamic linking takes
remove blurb,help _()
www.geocities.com/art_pl/gimp/gimp-art-003-1.patch.gz
po files:
www.geocities.com/art_pl/gimp/gimp-art-003-0.patch.gz
__ ___ |/ _,
| __ | | __ \ |_ _| -- Artur Polaczynski --
| __ | | _/| | --
Raphael wrote on Mon, 13 Mär 2000:
As an end-user, I prefer a stable application that may have less
features than another that has more features but that crashes or
complains that my system is not correctly configured.
Hey, this is, why the most of us don't use Windoze, I think ;-)))
Back to
Hello,
I just tried to mimik some algorithm for enhancing the colors of an image taken
by a digital camera (or a scanner, or ...) that was explained for photoshop
(and works very well -- far better than the automatic). By trying this I found
some things that have to be discussed (and maybe
